Shlomi Lavi / Dec 07, 2020
We publish unbiased reviews, our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. Learn more in our advertiser disclosure.
Convirza is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Mediahawk, Convirza is rated higher (85/100) than Mediahawk (77/100).
Looking for the right Call Tracking solution for your business? buyers like you are primarily concerned about the real total implementation cost (TCO), full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, pros and cons. In this article we compare between the 2 software products:
Mediahawk: Mediahawk is the market leader in call tracking and marketing analytics solutions to the business community, with over 14 years’ experience supplying many of the world’s largest blue-chip companies with call tracking software. We are also the experts in our field with a wealth of knowledge to help your company analyse and track your calls. Supp...
Convirza : Convirza is the first enterprise call tracking and call optimization platform. We combine traditional call tracking with the powerful analysis of phone calls. Convirza uses speech recognition technology and sophisticated algorithms to gauge lead quality, measure conversions, and take action with fully-baked marketing automation. We help sophistic...
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Call Tracking software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance & support and other related services. When calculating the TCO it's important to add all of these "hidden cost" as well. We prepared a TCO calculator for Mediahawk and Convirza.
Mediahawk price starts at $50 per user/month , on a scale between 1 to 10 Mediahawk is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Call Tracking software. Convirza price starts at $29 per month , when comparing Convirza to their competitors, the software is rated 6 - similar to the average Call Tracking software cost.
Bottom line:Convirza is more expensive than Mediahawk.
As with any business software solutions, it’s important to consider the features & functionality. The tool should support the processes, workflows, reports and needs that matter to your team. To help you evaluate this, we've compared Mediahawk Vs. Convirza based on some of the most important and required Call Tracking features. Mediahawk: We are still working to collect the list of features for Mediahawk. Convirza: We are still working to collect the list of features for Convirza.
Mediahawk's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, and Convirza's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.
starts at $50 per user/month
Mediahawk is a leading cloud-based Call Center software, it is designed to support small, medium and large size call centers. Mediahawk received a rating of 4.8 from ITQlick team. The software cost is considere...
Compare Pricing| ITQlick Score: | 77/100 |
|---|---|
| ITQlick Rating: | (4.8/5) |
| Pricing: | 4/10 - average cost |
| Category: | Call Tracking -> Mediahawk |
| Company: | Mediahawk |
| Pricing: | starts at $50 per user/month |
| Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
| Platforms: | Desktop, Mobile |
| Links: | Mediahawk review, Mediahawk pricing, Mediahawk alternatives |
| ITQlick Score: | 85/100 |
|---|---|
| ITQlick Rating: | (4/5) |
| Pricing: | 6/10 - average cost |
| Category: | Call Tracking -> Convirza |
| Company: | Convirza |
| Pricing: | starts at $29 per month |
| Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
| Platforms: | Desktop |
| Links: | Convirza review, Convirza pricing, Convirza alternatives |
Shlomi holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information System Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 15 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant, and implementation expert for small, medium and large size (global) companies.