midxcom is a truly integrated software solution for the long term care industry, delivering powerful, real-time information built on a resident-centric engine.
Compare PricingWe publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
midxcom is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Careficient, and Careficient is rated higher (90/100) than midxcom (85/100). midxcom offers users more features (2) than Careficient (0).
Looking for the right Long-Term Care solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
midxcom Software: midxcom is a truly integrated software solution for the long term care industry, delivering powerful, real-time information built on a resident-centric engine.
Careficient: With one web-based program, you can manage everything! You want to focus your resources on patient care. Now you can. Careficient takes the place of all of your other agency management tools.
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Long-Term Care software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for midxcom and Careficient AMS.
midxcom accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 midxcom is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Long-Term Care software. Careficient AMS accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 midxcom is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Long-Term Care software.
Bottom line: midxcom is more expensive than Careficient AMS.
We've compared midxcom Vs. Careficient based on some of the most important and required Long-Term Care features.
midxcom: Billing & Invoicing, Medical.
Careficient AMS: We are still working to collect the list of features for Careficient AMS.
midxcom's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, and Careficient AMS's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.
midxcom is a truly integrated software solution for the long term care industry, delivering powerful, real-time information built on a resident-centric engine.
Compare Pricing
Careficient AMS is a web-based Home Health software that enables administrators to manage the time spent on patient care and oversee overall organizational functions. It also allows them to ascertain staff memb...
Compare PricingITQlick Score: | 85/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 4/10 - average cost |
Category: | Long-Term Care -> midxcom review |
Company: | midxcom Software |
Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
Platforms: | Mobile, Cloud |
Links: | midxcom review, midxcom pricing, midxcom alternatives |
ITQlick Score: | 90/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 2/10 - low cost |
Category: | Home Health -> Careficient AMS review |
Company: | Careficient |
Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
Platforms: | Cloud |
Links: | Careficient AMS review, Careficient AMS pricing, Careficient AMS alternatives |
Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.