Compare mite and A3 Modeling - Oct 2022

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / Oct 01, 2022

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - mite or A3 Modeling?

A3 Modeling is more expensive to implement (TCO) than mite, and A3 Modeling is rated higher (80/100) than mite (62/100). A3 Modeling offers users more features (15) than mite (3).

Looking for the right Time Tracking solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

YOLK Vs. A3 Solutions

YOLK: Time tracking is vital for invoicing, accounting, and scheduling. Yes, it’s been an annoying necessity for all too long. Let’s strike back. With an advanced, yet simple tool to help you get things done: mite.

A3 Solutions: A3 Solutions is the developer of A3 Modeling, a powerful enterprise budgeting, forecasting, reporting and performance management platform. Inspired by the needs of Fortune 500 customers solving real-world problems, A3 Modeling enables you to solve the most challenging budgeting and Corporate Performance Management problems easily and cost effective...

Who is more expensive? mite or A3 Modeling?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Time Tracking software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for mite and A3 Modeling.

mite price starts at $5.38 per user/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 mite is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Time Tracking software. A3 Modeling price starts at $500 per user/month , When comparing A3 Modeling to its competitors, the software is rated 6 - similar to the average Time Tracking software cost.

Bottom line: A3 Modeling is more expensive than mite.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared mite Vs. A3 Modeling based on some of the most important and required Time Tracking features.

mite: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support.

A3 Modeling: Budgeting & Forecasting, Fund-Accounting, Ad-Hoc Analysis, Ad-Hoc Reporting, Automatic Scheduled Reporting.

Target customer size

mite's typical customers include: Small businesses and start ups, The software is basically intended for large enterprises, although medium businesses can also benefit from its services.



mite

ITQlick rating
(3.9/5)

starts at $5.38 per user/month

mite is a growing cloud-based Budgeting-Forecasting software, it is designed to support small and medium size business. mite received a rating of 3.9 from ITQlick team. The software cost is considered average ...

Categories: Budgeting & CPM, Financial reporting, Expense Management.

A3 Modeling

ITQlick rating
(4.8/5)

starts at $500 per user/month

A3 Modeling is an accounting and corporate performance management solution for your business. The software was designed by A3 Solutions headquartered in California, United States. It provides the important func...

Categories: Accounting & Finance, Budgeting & CPM, Financial reporting, Financial consolidation, Payroll Accounting.

Compare specifications

Compare features

mite: 3 Features

Data Import/Export
Basic Reports
Online Customer Support

A3 Modeling: 15 Features

Budgeting & Forecasting
Fund-Accounting
Ad-Hoc Analysis
Ad-Hoc Reporting
Automatic Scheduled Reporting
Customizable Dashboard
Customizable Features
Dashboarding
Forecasting & Budgeting
Graphic Benchmark
OLAP
Performance Measurements
Predictive-Analysis
Profit Analysis
Trend Indicators
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
mite
ITQlick rating
3.9/5
Score
62/100
Pricing
5.4/10
License pricing
$5.38 per user/month
Functionality
6
Review
Compare
A3 Model...
ITQlick rating
4.8/5
Score
80/100
Pricing
6.4/10
License pricing
$500 per user/month
Functionality
24
Compare
TSheets
ITQlick rating
4.7/5
Score
93/100
Pricing
2.2/10
License pricing
$15 per month
Functionality
18
TimeCloc...
ITQlick rating
3.3/5
Score
92/100
Pricing
4.8/10
License pricing
$2.50 per employee/month
Functionality
5
Harvest
ITQlick rating
4.5/5
Score
90/100
Pricing
2/10
License pricing
$12 per seat/month
Functionality
16

Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.