Compare Multiview and MultiCHAX - Mar 2022

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / Mar 12, 2022

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Multiview or MultiCHAX?

MultiCHAX is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Multiview, and Multiview is rated higher (93/100) than MultiCHAX (92/100). Multiview offers users more features (19) than MultiCHAX (3). There is a clear winner in this case and it is Multiview!

Looking for the right Core Accounting solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Multiview Financial Software Vs. Chax, Inc.

Multiview Financial Software: Company Information The Multiview Experience First, welcome to the Multiview world of quality products, people and processes. Unlike the companies we compete against, Multiview is the manufacturer of our software. The benefit to client companies is Multiview controls all the processes, end to end, which leaves us a great deal of flexibility in ...

Chax, Inc.: CHAX®: The most cost-effective check by phone, check by fax, and check by internet system available. Checks by phone, fax, or e-mail software allows you to enter your customer's check information, print the information on a blank check form, and deposit the check to any U.S. bank for deposit the same day. Now, collecting payments by check has ne...

Who is more expensive? Multiview or MultiCHAX?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Core Accounting software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Multiview and MultiCHAX.

Multiview price starts at $150 per user/year , On a scale between 1 to 10 Multiview is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Core Accounting software. MultiCHAX price starts at $99 per license , When comparing MultiCHAX to its competitors, the software is rated 6 - similar to the average Core Accounting software cost.

Bottom line: MultiCHAX is more expensive than Multiview.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Multiview Vs. MultiCHAX based on some of the most important and required Core Accounting features.

Multiview: this software is considered "feature-rich" with more than 10 important features, here is a partial list: Accounts Payable, Accounts Receivable, Billing & Invoicing, Budgeting & Forecasting, Fixed-Assets, Fund-Accounting, Multi-Currency, Tax compliance.

MultiCHAX: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support.

Target customer size

Multiview Financial Software is suited for most companies of varying sizes that also need a solution that facilitates in-depth management of their accounting branch. Customers of the software mainly include small and medium businesses with backgrounds in various major industries.



Multiview

ITQlick rating
(4.6/5)

starts at $150 per user/year

Multiview Financial Software is a cloud-based modular financial management system that incorporates accounts payable, accounts receivable, purchase order management, a general ledger, inventory management, busi...

Categories: Accounting & Finance, Billing & Invoicing, Budgeting & CPM, Core Accounting.

MultiCHAX

ITQlick rating
(3.4/5)

starts at $99 per license

MultiCHAX is a check printing solution for small and medium businesses. It manages printing of payables and payroll checks along with MICR coding. The software was developed and launched by CHAX Inc hea...

Categories: Accounting & Finance, Core Accounting.

Compare specifications

Compare features

Multiview: 19 Features

Accounts Payable
Accounts Receivable
Billing & Invoicing
Budgeting & Forecasting
Fixed-Assets
Fund-Accounting
Multi-Currency
Tax compliance
Time & Expense
Accounts Payable
Accounts Receivable
Billing & Invoicing
Purchase Orders
Data Analysis Tools
Time and Expense Tracking
Enterprise Resource Planning
CRM
Fixed Asset Management
Inventory Management

MultiCHAX: 3 Features

Data Import/Export
Basic Reports
Online Customer Support
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
Multivie...
ITQlick rating
4.6/5
Score
93/100
Pricing
3.8/10
License pricing
$150 per user/year
Functionality
53
Compare
MultiCHAX
ITQlick rating
3.4/5
Score
92/100
Pricing
7/10
License pricing
$99 per license
Functionality
5
QuickBoo...
ITQlick rating
4.2/5
Score
99/100
Pricing
5/10
License pricing
$12.50 per month
Functionality
7
Wave Acc...
ITQlick rating
4.4/5
Score
97/100
Pricing
5.6/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
8
Zoho Boo...
ITQlick rating
4.4/5
Score
96/100
Pricing
2.4/10
License pricing
$10 per organizer/month
Functionality
9

Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.