Compare NimbleSchedule and Gusto - Apr 2022

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / Apr 16, 2022

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn more by reading our advertiser disclosure.

Bottom Line: Which is Better - NimbleSchedule or Gusto?

Gusto is more expensive to implement (TCO) than NimbleSchedule, Gusto is rated higher (99/100) than NimbleSchedule (86/100). Gusto offers more features (9) to their users than NimbleSchedule (8).

Looking for the right Employee Scheduling solution for your business? buyers like you are primarily concerned about the real total implementation cost (TCO), full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, pros and cons. In this article we compare between the 2 software products:

How Nimbleschedule compares with Gusto?

Nimbleschedule: NimbleSchedule online employee software for staff scheduling shrinks a tedious process into just minutes. There has never been software for employee scheduling that is this versatile and easy to use. Used for simple scheduling or more complex tasks, it makes adjustments and changes easy. By actively involving employees in the process you boost mora...

Gusto: Gusto was started in 2011 by best friends Josh, Tomer and Eddie to help every business in the world put people first. In 2015, we expanded our payroll service to all 50 states and opened a new office in Denver. We changed our name from ZenPayroll to Gusto to celebrate our customers' courage and passion. We also added health benefits and compliance ...

Who's more expensive? NimbleSchedule or Gusto HR?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Employee Scheduling software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance & support and other related services. When calculating the TCO it's important to add all of these "hidden cost" as well. We prepared a TCO calculator for NimbleSchedule and Gusto HR.

NimbleSchedule price starts at $2 per license , on a scale between 1 to 10 NimbleSchedule is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Employee Scheduling software. Gusto HR price starts at $39 per month , when comparing Gusto HR to their competitors, the software is rated 4 - lower than the average Employee Scheduling software cost.

Bottom line:Gusto HR is more expensive than NimbleSchedule.

Which software includes more/better features?

As with any business software solutions, it’s important to consider the features & functionality. The tool should support the processes, workflows, reports and needs that matter to your team. To help you evaluate this, we've compared NimbleSchedule Vs. Gusto based on some of the most important and required Employee Scheduling features. NimbleSchedule: Employee Self-Service, Payroll, Timesheet, Mobile Access, Automated Scheduling, Employee Database, Employee Scheduling, Scheduling. Gusto HR: Payroll, Human Resources, Employee Onboarding, Workforce Management, Benefits Administration.

Target customer size

NimbleSchedule is perfect for small and mid-size organizations and can be used by large organizations too. and Gusto HR's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.

NimbleSchedule

ITQlick rating
(4.5/5)

starts at $2 per license

Ximble software, formerly known as NimbleSchedule, is a cloud-hosted employee scheduling platform with accurate time tracking tools. The software enables employees and managers to manage time-off requests, sch...

Categories: Human Resources, Employee Management, Employee Recognition, Employee Scheduling.

Gusto

ITQlick rating
(4.7/5)

starts at $39 per month

A well-supported team is the key to a successful business. With Gusto easy-to-use platform, you can empower your people and push your business forward.

Categories: Check Printing, Performance Management, Document Management, Human Resources, Applicant Tracking.

Compare specifications

Gusto Specifications

ITQlick Score: 99/100
ITQlick Rating: (4.7/5)
Pricing: 4/10 - average cost
Category: Human Resources -> Gusto
Company: Gusto
Pricing: starts at $39 per month
Typical customers: Small, medium and large size businesses
Platforms: Desktop, Mobile, Cloud
Links: Gusto review, Gusto pricing, Gusto alternatives

Compare features

NimbleSchedule: 8 Features

Employee Self-Service
Payroll
Timesheet
Mobile Access
Automated Scheduling
Employee Database
Employee Scheduling
Scheduling

Gusto HR: 9 Features

Payroll
Human Resources
Employee Onboarding
Workforce Management
Benefits Administration
Applicant Tracking
Compliant With HIPAA
Business tax
Task Management
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
NimbleSchedule
ITQlick rating
4.5/5
Score
86/100
Pricing
2.6/10
License pricing
$2 per license
Functionality
21
Compare
Gusto
ITQlick rating
4.7/5
Score
99/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
$39 per month
Functionality
20
Review
ScheduleBase
ITQlick rating
4/5
Score
92/100
Pricing
7/10
License pricing
$10 per month
Functionality
5
WinCalendar
ITQlick rating
4.3/5
Score
91/100
Pricing
6.4/10
License pricing
$32 per license
Functionality
4
Deputy
ITQlick rating
4.7/5
Score
90/100
Pricing
2/10
License pricing
$2.50 per user/month
Functionality
17
Review
Author

Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin Facebook Twitter

Shlomi holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information System Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 15 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant, and implementation expert for small, medium and large size (global) companies.