Olark Vs WhosOn (Jul 2020)
Compare PricingShlomi Lavi / Jul 21, 2020
We publish unbiased reviews, our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. Learn more in our advertiser disclosure.
WhosOn
starts at $33 per license
WhosOn is a growing cloud-based Website analysis software, it is designed to support small, medium and large size business. WhosOn received a rating of 4.1 from ITQlick team. The software cost is considered aff...
Compare PricingCompare specifications
Olark Specifications
ITQlick Score: | 91/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: | (4.6/5) |
Pricing: | 2/10 - low cost |
Category: | Chat -> Olark |
Company: | Olark |
Pricing: | starts at $12 per user/month |
Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
Platforms: | Desktop, Mobile, Cloud |
Links: | Olark review, Olark pricing, Olark alternatives |
WhosOn Specifications
ITQlick Score: | 90/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: | (4.1/5) |
Pricing: | 4/10 - average cost |
Category: | Chat -> WhosOn |
Company: | Parker Software |
Pricing: | starts at $33 per license |
Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
Platforms: | Desktop |
Links: | WhosOn review, WhosOn pricing, WhosOn alternatives |
Compare features
Olark: 3 Features
WhosOn: 3 Features
Bottom Line: Which is Better - Olark or WhosOn?
WhosOn is more expensive to implement (TCO - Total Cost of Ownership) than Olark, Olark is rated higher (91/100) than WhosOn (90/100). Both tools offer the same amount of features.
Looking for the right Chat solution for your business? buyers like you are primarily concerned about the real total implementation cost (TCO), full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, pros and cons. In this article we compare between the 2 software products:
How Olark compares with Parker Software ?
Olark: Olark is: Ben Congleton, Roland Osborne, Matt Pizzimenti, Zach Steindler, Aaron Wilson, Bill Thompson, Brandon Dimcheff, Sunir Shah, Lindsay Elia, Jeff Zellner, Ryan LaBarge, Joe Westhead, Kyle Lambert, Laure Parsons, Fernando Takai, and Nick MacInnis. We build slick software (and climb Redwoods) Formally launched in August of 2009, we receiv...
Parker Software : Parker Software is a UK based independent software house. Established in 2003 we have offices in the USA and the UK. Parker Software develops innovative software aimed at companies that do business on the web.
Who's more expensive? Olark or WhosOn?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Chat software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance & support and other related services. When calculating the TCO it's important to add all of these "hidden cost" as well. We prepared a TCO calculator for Olark and WhosOn.
Olark price starts at $12 per user/month , on a scale between 1 to 10 Olark is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Chat software. WhosOn price starts at $33 per license , when comparing WhosOn to their competitors, the software is rated 4 - lower than the average Chat software cost.
Bottom line:WhosOn is more expensive than Olark.
Which software includes more/better features?
As with any business software solutions, it’s important to consider the features & functionality. The tool should support the processes, workflows, reports and needs that matter to your team. To help you evaluate this, we've compared Olark Vs. WhosOn based on some of the most important and required Chat features. Olark: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support. WhosOn: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support.
Target customer size
Olark is suitable for startup marketers, small companies and companies providing online services. and WhosOn's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.
Author

Shlomi Lavi
Shlomi holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information System Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 15 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant, and implementation expert for small, medium and large size (global) companies.