Shlomi Lavi / May 24, 2022We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
On-Time Web is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Toggl, and Toggl is rated higher (90/100) than On-Time Web (84/100). Both tools offer the same amount of features.
Looking for the right Time Tracking solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
On-Time Web: We provide businesses with innovative technology solutions, services and products to help them do business easier, faster and better. By making them successful we are successful.
toggl LLC: toggl LLC was founded by Brian Jeide and David Power, seasoned business executives, technology experts, and ordinary guys who always had that burning desire to do something entirely their own. Eventually the passion won out and they each took the plunge to start their own entrepreneurial ventures. They navigated the complex landscape, succeeded and...
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Time Tracking software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for On-Time Web and Toggl.
On-Time Web price starts at $1.46 per employee/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 On-Time Web is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Time Tracking software. Toggl price starts at $9 per user/month , When comparing Toggl to its competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Time Tracking software cost.
Bottom line: On-Time Web cost is around the same cost of Toggl.
We've compared On-Time Web Vs. Toggl based on some of the most important and required Time Tracking features.
On-Time Web: Mobile Access, Benefits Administration, Payroll Scheduling, Payroll Tax Management, Time Tracking.
Toggl: Basic Reports, Data Import/Export, Online Customer Support, Time and Expense Tracking, Time Tracking.
On-Time Web's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, Customers of the software mainly include small and medium businesses with backgrounds in major industries.
starts at $1.46 per employee/month
On Time Web is a web based time and attendance, time clock, web timesheet and project time capturing solution that is offered as a complete internet hosted service. It ensures data capturing through the web tim...
Compare Pricing| ITQlick Score: | 84/100 |
|---|---|
| ITQlick Rating: |
|
| Pricing: | 2/10 - low cost |
| Category: | Time Tracking -> On-Time Web review |
| Company: | On-Time Web |
| Pricing: | starts at $1.46 per employee/month |
| Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
| Platforms: | Desktop, Mobile, Cloud |
| Links: | On-Time Web review, On-Time Web pricing, On-Time Web alternatives |
| ITQlick Score: | 90/100 |
|---|---|
| ITQlick Rating: |
|
| Pricing: | 2/10 - low cost |
| Category: | Time Tracking -> Toggl review |
| Company: | toggl LLC |
| Pricing: | starts at $9 per user/month |
| Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
| Platforms: | Desktop, Mobile, Cloud |
| Links: | Toggl review, Toggl pricing, Toggl alternatives |
Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.