OnBlick ATS Vs CEIPAL

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / Sep 06, 2021

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. Learn more by reading our advertiser disclosure.

Bottom Line: Which is Better - OnBlick ATS or CEIPAL?

OnBlick ATS is more expensive to implement (TCO) than CEIPAL, OnBlick ATS is rated higher (80/100) than CEIPAL (76/100). OnBlick ATS offers more features (5) to their users than CEIPAL (0).

Looking for the right Recruiting Agency solution for your business? buyers like you are primarily concerned about the real total implementation cost (TCO), full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, pros and cons. In this article we compare between the 2 software products:

How Onblick compares with CEIPAL, LLC?

Onblick: OnBlick HR keeps your company compliant by digitizing I9 Form, I-983 Form and PAFs. Based on your hiring practices it also recommends matching SOC codes and Wage levels for the LCA.

CEIPAL, LLC: This is the very picture that we had in mind before giving birth to CEIPAL, to provide simplified and streamlined HCM solutions at a cost which everybody can utilize. And when we say everybody, we mean everybody. And before we knew it we were well underway in making a breakthrough in the stagnant market of pricy HCM solutions. With the advent of CE...

Who's more expensive? OnBlick ATS or CEIPAL WorkForce?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Recruiting Agency software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance & support and other related services. When calculating the TCO it's important to add all of these "hidden cost" as well. We prepared a TCO calculator for OnBlick ATS and CEIPAL WorkForce.

OnBlick ATS price Has a free version , on a scale between 1 to 10 OnBlick ATS is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Recruiting Agency software. CEIPAL WorkForce price starts at $105 per month , when comparing CEIPAL WorkForce to their competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Recruiting Agency software cost.

Bottom line: OnBlick ATS is more expensive than CEIPAL WorkForce.

Which software includes more/better features?

As with any business software solutions, it’s important to consider the features & functionality. The tool should support the processes, workflows, reports and needs that matter to your team. To help you evaluate this, we've compared OnBlick ATS Vs. CEIPAL based on some of the most important and required Recruiting Agency features. OnBlick ATS: Workflow, Recruiting Management, Resume Database, Applicant Tracking, Configurable Workflow. CEIPAL WorkForce: We are still working to collect the list of features for CEIPAL WorkForce.

Target customer size

OnBlick ATS's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, and CEIPAL WorkForce's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.

OnBlick ATS

ITQlick rating
(4.8/5)

Has a free version

OnBlick ATS is a growing cloud-based Recruiting Agency software, it is designed to support small, medium and large size recruitment agencies. OnBlick ATS received a rating of 4.8 from ITQlick team. The software...

Categories: Self-Service Portal, Applicant Tracking, Employee Recognition, Recruiting Agency.

CEIPAL WorkForce

ITQlick rating
(4.5/5)

starts at $105 per month

CEIPAL WorkForce is a cloud-based Human Resource Software that enables its users to manage employee startups and engagement with respect to their productivity levels and overall performance in the organization;...

Categories: Budgeting & CPM, General Contractor, Self-Service Portal, Product Lifecycle Management, Human Resources.

Compare specifications

Compare features

OnBlick ATS: 5 Features

Workflow
Recruiting Management
Resume Database
Applicant Tracking
Configurable Workflow

CEIPAL WorkForce: 0 Features

We are working to collect the information
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
OnBlick
ITQlick rating
4.8/5
Score
80/100
Pricing
7/10
License pricing
Has a free version
Functionality
13
Compare
CEIPAL
ITQlick rating
4.5/5
Score
76/100
Pricing
2.8/10
License pricing
$105 per month
Functionality
12
Review
Avionte
ITQlick rating
4/5
Score
93/100
Pricing
8.6/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
13
ProStaff
ITQlick rating
3.2/5
Score
90/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
$60,000 per license
Functionality
4
Identified
ITQlick rating
4.3/5
Score
89/100
Pricing
5/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
13
Author

Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin Facebook Twitter

Shlomi holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information System Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 15 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant, and implementation expert for small, medium and large size (global) companies.