Compare OnBlick ATS and CEIPAL - Oct 2022

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - OnBlick ATS or CEIPAL?

OnBlick ATS is more expensive to implement (TCO) than CEIPAL, and OnBlick ATS is rated higher (80/100) than CEIPAL (76/100). OnBlick ATS offers users more features (5) than CEIPAL (0).

Looking for the right Recruiting Agency solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Onblick Vs. CEIPAL, LLC

Onblick: OnBlick HR keeps your company compliant by digitizing I9 Form, I-983 Form and PAFs. Based on your hiring practices it also recommends matching SOC codes and Wage levels for the LCA.

CEIPAL, LLC: This is the very picture that we had in mind before giving birth to CEIPAL, to provide simplified and streamlined HCM solutions at a cost which everybody can utilize. And when we say everybody, we mean everybody. And before we knew it we were well underway in making a breakthrough in the stagnant market of pricy HCM solutions. With the advent of CE...

Who is more expensive? OnBlick ATS or CEIPAL WorkForce?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Recruiting Agency software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for OnBlick ATS and CEIPAL WorkForce.

OnBlick ATS price Has a free version , On a scale between 1 to 10 OnBlick ATS is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Recruiting Agency software. CEIPAL WorkForce price starts at $105 per month , When comparing CEIPAL WorkForce to its competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Recruiting Agency software cost.

Bottom line: OnBlick ATS is more expensive than CEIPAL WorkForce.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared OnBlick ATS Vs. CEIPAL based on some of the most important and required Recruiting Agency features.

OnBlick ATS: Workflow, Recruiting Management, Resume Database, Applicant Tracking, Configurable Workflow.

CEIPAL WorkForce: We are still working to collect the list of features for CEIPAL WorkForce.

Target customer size

OnBlick ATS's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, and CEIPAL WorkForce's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.