Compare PageUp People and Avature ATS - Jun 2022

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / Jun 18, 2022

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - PageUp People or Avature ATS?

PageUp People is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Avature ATS, and Avature ATS is rated higher (92/100) than PageUp People (83/100). Avature ATS offers users more features (4) than PageUp People (0). There is a clear winner in this case and it is Avature ATS!

Looking for the right Applicant Tracking solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

PageUp People Vs. Avature

PageUp People: Since 1997, PageUp has helped employers worldwide attract, hire, develop, retain, and improve employee performance. Our Unified Talent Management platform, along with our talent management consulting services, help you optimize your multinational workforce strategy across the whole business, maximize business impact with a balance between global ef...

Avature: Avature is a highly flexible enterprise SaaS platform for Global Talent Acquisition and Talent Management, and the leading global provider of CRM for recruiting. Founded by Dimitri Boylan, co-founder and former CEO of HotJobs.com, Avature brings commercial internet technology and innovation to recruiting, internal mobility, and performance challeng...

Who is more expensive? PageUp People or Avature ATS?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Applicant Tracking software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for PageUp People and Avature ATS.

PageUp People accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 PageUp People is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Applicant Tracking software. Avature ATS price Has a free version , When comparing Avature ATS to its competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Applicant Tracking software cost.

Bottom line: PageUp People is more expensive than Avature ATS.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared PageUp People Vs. Avature ATS based on some of the most important and required Applicant Tracking features.

PageUp People: We are still working to collect the list of features for PageUp People.

Avature ATS: Workflow, Applicant Tracking, Resume Database, Configurable Workflow.

Target customer size

The software is a useful product for businesses of all sizes without any restriction on industrial affiliation. Customers of the software include thousands of small and big companies all over the world.

PageUp People

ITQlick rating
(3.2/5)

PageUp People is a web based applicant tracking solution designed for businesses of all sizes. It offers such services as interview management, resume search and parsing, social media integration, and others. T...

Categories: Performance Management, Human Resources, Applicant Tracking, Compensation Management.

Avature ATS

ITQlick rating
(4.6/5)

Has a free version

Avature ATS enables global organizations to go beyond the constraints of legacy ATS by combining modern web technology with powerful customization and advanced analytics to make strategic HR possible.

Categories: Applicant Tracking, Employee Recognition, Recruitment, HR Department, Workforce Management.

Compare specifications

Compare features

PageUp People: 0 Features

We are working to collect the list of features

Avature ATS: 4 Features

Workflow
Applicant Tracking
Resume Database
Configurable Workflow
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
PageUp P...
ITQlick rating
3.2/5
Score
83/100
Pricing
5.6/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
11
Compare
Avature ...
ITQlick rating
4.6/5
Score
92/100
Pricing
3.2/10
License pricing
Has a free version
Functionality
11
ADP Work...
ITQlick rating
4.3/5
Score
98/100
Pricing
3.6/10
License pricing
$62 per month
Functionality
18
Collage ...
ITQlick rating
4.1/5
Score
97/100
Pricing
2.6/10
License pricing
$7 per user/month
Functionality
22
Bullhorn...
ITQlick rating
4.1/5
Score
97/100
Pricing
2.2/10
License pricing
$99 per user/month
Functionality
18

Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.