Shlomi Lavi / Jul 21, 2020
We publish unbiased reviews, our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. Learn more in our advertiser disclosure.
Pamar Collection is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Qvinci, Qvinci is rated higher (90/100) than Pamar Collection (57/100). Pamar Collection offers more features (3) to their users than Qvinci (0).
Looking for the right Financial reporting solution for your business? buyers like you are primarily concerned about the real total implementation cost (TCO), full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, pros and cons. In this article we compare between the 2 software products:
Pamar Systems: Since 1980, our commitment to superior products and excellent service has made Pamar Systems a proven industry leader in the development of revenue recovery systems. We view every customer relationship as a long-term partnership with one objective: the continuing success of our customer's organzation.
Qvinci: Qvinci Software was founded in June of 2007 as a data-visualization software company focused on providing best-of-class financial accounting and reporting tools for small and medium-size businesses. We have grown into a team of entrepreneurs, engineers, and business professionals all with the same goal: to provide the best product to small business...
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Financial reporting software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance & support and other related services. When calculating the TCO it's important to add all of these "hidden cost" as well. We prepared a TCO calculator for Pamar Collection and Qvinci.
Pamar Collection price starts at $150 per user/month , on a scale between 1 to 10 Pamar Collection System is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Financial reporting software. Qvinci price starts at $4.95 per user/month , when comparing Qvinci to their competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Financial reporting software cost.
Bottom line: Pamar Collection is more expensive than Qvinci.
As with any business software solutions, it’s important to consider the features & functionality. The tool should support the processes, workflows, reports and needs that matter to your team. To help you evaluate this, we've compared Pamar Collection Vs. Qvinci based on some of the most important and required Financial reporting features. Pamar Collection: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support. Qvinci: We are still working to collect the list of features for Qvinci.
Customers of the software include businesses of all sizes and a wide range of types. Customers of the software include businesses of all sizes and a wide range of types.
starts at $150 per user/month
Pamar Collection System is a debt collection solution for businesses of all sizes. It offers such capabilities as automated work queues, debt maintenance, electronic account placement, and others. The software ...
Compare Pricing| ITQlick Score: | 57/100 |
|---|---|
| ITQlick Rating: | (4.1/5) |
| Pricing: | 4/10 - average cost |
| Category: | Financial reporting -> Pamar Collection |
| Company: | Pamar Systems |
| Pricing: | starts at $150 per user/month |
| Typical customers: | Start up, Small business, Medium business, Large business |
| Platforms: | Desktop |
| Links: | Pamar Collection review, Pamar Collection pricing, Pamar Collection alternatives |
| ITQlick Score: | 90/100 |
|---|---|
| ITQlick Rating: | (3.7/5) |
| Pricing: | 2/10 - low cost |
| Category: | Financial reporting -> Qvinci |
| Company: | Qvinci |
| Pricing: | starts at $4.95 per user/month |
| Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
| Platforms: | Desktop, Cloud |
| Links: | Qvinci review, Qvinci pricing, Qvinci alternatives |
Shlomi holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information System Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 15 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant, and implementation expert for small, medium and large size (global) companies.