Compare Paycom and eSUB - Mar 2022
Compare PricingWe publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - Paycom or eSUB?
Paycom is more expensive to implement (TCO) than eSUB, and eSUB is rated higher (97/100) than Paycom (78/100). eSUB offers users more features (17) than Paycom (0). There is a clear winner in this case and it is eSUB!
Looking for the right Time-sheet entry solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
Paycom payroll Services Vs. eSUB
Paycom payroll Services: Regardless of the complexity of your current processes, we can streamline payroll and HR into one online application. See for yourself why Paycom’s technology has made us the fastest growing payroll company in the country.
eSUB: About 30 years ago eSUB originated as an off shoot of a consulting firm who represented Specialty Contractors to create construction claims for retroactive payment for work they had already performed. Managing project documents back then was inefficient, subject to mistakes and omissions. The familiar way was to manually update multiple programs...
Who is more expensive? Paycom or eSUB?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Time-sheet entry software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Paycom and eSUB.
Paycom price starts at $195.67 per license , On a scale between 1 to 10 Paycom is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Time-sheet entry software. eSUB accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Paycom is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Time-sheet entry software.
Bottom line: Paycom is more expensive than eSUB.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared Paycom Vs. eSUB based on some of the most important and required Time-sheet entry features.
Paycom: We are still working to collect the list of features for Paycom.
eSUB: Mobile Access, Telephone Customer Support, Web Hosted Solution, Document Management, Resource Management.
Target customer size
Paycom's typical customers include: Medium and large size businesses, eSUB is specifically designed for subcontractors running a small and mid-size business.
Compare specifications
Paycom Specifications
ITQlick Score: | 78/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 6/10 - average cost |
Category: | Time-sheet entry -> Paycom review |
Company: | Paycom payroll Services |
Pricing: | starts at $195.67 per license |
Typical customers: | Medium and large size businesses |
Platforms: | Cloud |
Links: | Paycom review, Paycom pricing, Paycom alternatives |
eSUB Specifications
ITQlick Score: | 97/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 2/10 - low cost |
Category: | Construction -> eSUB review |
Company: | eSUB |
Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
Platforms: | Desktop, Mobile, Cloud |
Links: | eSUB review, eSUB pricing, eSUB alternatives |
Compare features
Paycom: 0 Features
eSUB: 17 Features
Auditor - Shlomi Lavi
Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.