Compare Payzerware and Procore Estimating - Jun 2022
Compare PricingWe publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - Payzerware or Procore Estimating?
Procore Estimating is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Payzerware, and Procore Estimating is rated higher (90/100) than Payzerware (89/100).
Looking for the right Field Service solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
Payzer Vs. Esticom
Payzer: Our company is Payzer. We’ve grown quickly because we work together and we put the customer first.
Esticom: Easy to use cloud based onscreen takeoff and estimating application purpose built for subcontractors. Our simple to user product is affordable and includes onscreen takeoff, estimating and creates quotes all in a single integrated package.
Who is more expensive? Payzerware or Esticom?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Field Service software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Payzerware and Esticom.
Payzerware price starts at $399 per month , On a scale between 1 to 10 Payzerware is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Field Service software. Esticom price starts at $30 per user/month , When comparing Esticom to its competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Field Service software cost.
Bottom line: Payzerware cost is around the same cost of Esticom.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared Payzerware Vs. Procore Estimating based on some of the most important and required Field Service features.
Payzerware: We are still working to collect the list of features for Payzerware.
Esticom: We are still working to collect the list of features for Esticom.
Target customer size
Payzerware's typical customers include: SMBs, and Esticom's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.
Procore Estimating
starts at $30 per user/month
Procore Estimating is a cloud-based construction software for contractors to build accurate construction cost estimates and streamline the need for spreadsheets and paperwork, thus saving more time for project ...
Compare PricingCompare specifications
Payzerware Specifications
ITQlick Score: | 89/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 2/10 - low cost |
Category: | Field Service -> Payzerware review |
Company: | Payzer |
Pricing: | starts at $399 per month |
Typical customers: | SMBs |
Platforms: | Cloud |
Links: | Payzerware review, Payzerware pricing, Payzerware alternatives |
Procore Estimating Specifications
ITQlick Score: | 90/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 2/10 - low cost |
Category: | Construction -> Procore Estimating review |
Company: | Esticom |
Pricing: | starts at $30 per user/month |
Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
Platforms: | Desktop |
Links: | Procore Estimating review, Procore Estimating pricing, Procore Estimating alternatives |
Compare features
Payzerware: 0 Features
Esticom: 0 Features
Auditor - Shlomi Lavi
Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.