Shlomi Lavi / Feb 24, 2023We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
pCloud is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Filevine, and Filevine is rated higher (96/100) than pCloud (76/100). Filevine offers users more features (9) than pCloud (7). There is a clear winner in this case and it is Filevine!
Looking for the right File Sharing solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
pCloud: At pCloud, we are providing the world with a comprehensive easy-to-use cloud storage solution for individuals and businesses alike. Our approach incorporates the technical point-of-view with the end user in mind. Other cloud services are either too technical and are not user-friendly, or they are not comprehensive enough for users to get everything...
Filevine: Filevine lets you communicate clearly without interrupting each others workflows. Share and edit documents, assign tasks and connect calendars to stay in sync and on time.
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of File Sharing software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for pCloud and Filevine.
pCloud price starts at $175 per license , On a scale between 1 to 10 pCloud is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of File Sharing software. Filevine accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 pCloud is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of File Sharing software.
Bottom line: pCloud cost is around the same cost of Filevine.
We've compared pCloud Vs. Filevine based on some of the most important and required File Sharing features.
pCloud: Version Control, Workflow, Project Collaboration, User Access Controls, Document Management, File sharing, Backup.
Filevine: Version Control, Collaboration, Document Management, Task Management, Document Assembly.
pCloud's typical customers include: Medium and large size businesses,
Filevine Legal Management software is typically used by law firms, in-house legal departments, and other legal professionals.
starts at $175 per license
pCloud is a growing cloud-based Document Management software, it is designed to support medium and large size business. pCloud received a rating of 4.5 from ITQlick team. The software cost is considered afforda...
Compare Pricing| ITQlick Score: | 76/100 |
|---|---|
| ITQlick Rating: |
|
| Pricing: | 2/10 - low cost |
| Category: | File Sharing -> pCloud review |
| Company: | pCloud |
| Pricing: | starts at $175 per license |
| Typical customers: | Medium and large size businesses |
| Platforms: | Desktop, Mobile, Cloud |
| Links: | pCloud review, pCloud pricing, pCloud alternatives |
| ITQlick Score: | 96/100 |
|---|---|
| ITQlick Rating: |
|
| Pricing: | 2/10 - low cost |
| Category: | Legal Management -> Filevine review |
| Company: | Filevine |
| Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
| Platforms: | Desktop, Mobile, Cloud |
| Links: | Filevine review, Filevine pricing, Filevine alternatives |
Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.