Compare Physical Inventory Count and Kinetic WMS - Dec 2022

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Physical Inventory Count or Kinetic WMS?

Kinetic WMS is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Physical Inventory Count, and Kinetic WMS is rated higher (95/100) than Physical Inventory Count (55/100). Kinetic WMS offers users more features (16) than Physical Inventory Count (0).

Looking for the right Asset Tracking solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

DMS Insight Works Vs. Epicor Software Corporation

DMS Insight Works: DMS Insight Works is a leader in Operational Productivity Improvement through the efficient implementation of add-ons for Microsoft Dynamics NAV ERP business systems. DMS has focused their efforts on helping Manufacturing, Warehousing, and Distribution Companies get the most out of Microsoft Dynamics NAV ERP. This focus has helped DMS build up a de...

Epicor Software Corporation: Our commitment to providing world-class software and innovative technologies. The global infrastructure and experience to support new companies, regional companies and global affiliates. The determination to achieve superior customer service by a very high customer satisfaction. The strength, vision and profitability in order to act as a long-term ...

Who is more expensive? Physical Inventory Count or Epicor WMS?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Asset Tracking software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Physical Inventory Count and Epicor WMS.

Physical Inventory Count accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Physical Inventory Count is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Asset Tracking software. Epicor WMS price starts at $55 per user/month , When comparing Epicor WMS to its competitors, the software is rated 6 - similar to the average Asset Tracking software cost.

Bottom line: Epicor WMS is more expensive than Physical Inventory Count.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Physical Inventory Count Vs. Kinetic WMS based on some of the most important and required Asset Tracking features.

Physical Inventory Count: We are still working to collect the list of features for Physical Inventory Count.

Epicor WMS: Inventory Management, Supply Chain Monitoring, Supply Chain Planning, Accounting Integration, CRM Integration.

Target customer size

Physical Inventory Count's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, Kinetic WMS is recommended for small to large companies that need to enhance their resource management.