Shlomi Lavi /
Jul 16, 2022
We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - PlanGrid or SharpeSoft Field Reporter?
SharpeSoft Field Reporter is more expensive to implement (TCO) than PlanGrid, and PlanGrid is rated higher (98/100) than SharpeSoft Field Reporter (82/100). SharpeSoft Field Reporter offers users more features (9) than PlanGrid (5).
Looking for the right Construction solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
PlanGrid Vs. SharpeSoft Inc.
PlanGrid: Founded in 2011 by two pairs of construction engineers and computer scientists, PlanGrid brings beautiful, intuitive software solutions to the construction industry. Today, hundreds of thousands of construction professionals build their buildings and infrastructure using PlanGrid.
SharpeSoft Inc.: SharpeSoft Inc. was founded in 1986 by an estimator discouraged with the estimating software he found on the market. The programs available made the bidding process difficult and unnatural since they did not allow estimators to bid the way they were used to. Rather they required the user to follow a rigid format created by a software developer who ...
Who is more expensive? PlanGrid or SharpeSoft Field Reporter?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Construction software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for PlanGrid and SharpeSoft Field Reporter.
PlanGrid price starts at $39 per user/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 PlanGrid is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Construction software. SharpeSoft Field Reporter accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 PlanGrid is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Construction software.
Bottom line: SharpeSoft Field Reporter is more expensive than PlanGrid.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared PlanGrid Vs. SharpeSoft Field Reporter based on some of the most important and required Construction features.
PlanGrid: Mobile Access, Collaboration, Document Management, Issue Tracking, Task Management.
SharpeSoft Field Reporter: Accounting Management, Bidding, Cost Management, Document Management, Equipment Management.
Target customer size
PlanGrid's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, The software is a useful product for construction businesses of all sizes and a variety of types.