Compare Practice fusion and Sevocity EHR - Feb 2023

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / Feb 22, 2023

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Practice fusion or Sevocity EHR?

Sevocity EHR is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Practice fusion, and Practice fusion is rated higher (99/100) than Sevocity EHR (90/100). Practice fusion offers users more features (12) than Sevocity EHR (8). There is a clear winner in this case and it is Practice fusion!

Looking for the right Medical solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

practice fusion Vs. Sevocity Electronic Health Records

practice fusion: Our implementation specialists are here to give you as much personal guidance as your practice needs to successfully start using your new EHR.

Sevocity Electronic Health Records: Our vision for EHR is simple: Electronic Health Records should be easy to implement, easy to use and affordable. You should be able to call for support 24 hours a day, 365 days a year and talk live with an expert based in the United States. You depend on your EHR so your EHR company should have years of experience and be reliable and secure. ...

Who is more expensive? Practice fusion or Sevocity?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Medical software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Practice fusion and Sevocity.

Practice fusion price starts at $149 per provider/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 Practice fusion is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Medical software. Sevocity price starts at $369 per provider/month , When comparing Sevocity to its competitors, the software is rated 4 - lower than the average Medical software cost.

Bottom line: Sevocity is more expensive than Practice fusion.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Practice fusion Vs. Sevocity EHR based on some of the most important and required Medical features.

Practice fusion: this software is considered "feature-rich" with more than 10 important features, here is a partial list: Basic Reports, Data Import/Export, Online Customer Support, Appointment Management, Charting, E-Prescribing, HIPAA Compliant, Medication history.

Sevocity: Appointment Management, Charting, E-Prescribing, E/M Coding, Handwriting Recognition.

Target customer size

Practice Fusion Medical Software serves a wide range of healthcare providers, including primary care physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and specialists such as dermatologists, psychiatrists, and oncologists.

Sevocity Medical Software caters to medical practices of all sizes, from solo practitioners to large hospitals and healthcare systems.



Practice fusion

ITQlick rating
(4.5/5)

starts at $149 per provider/month

Practice Fusion is a medical practice management and EHR solution for medical practices of all sizes. The software offers a variety of electronic health record solutions along with practice management features....

Categories: Self-Service Portal, Medical, Allergy EMR, Cardiology EMR.

Sevocity EHR

ITQlick rating
(4.4/5)

starts at $369 per provider/month

Sevocity EHR is a cloud-based medical solution that is designed for solo and small group practices. It has a number of features that include customizable work queues, HIPAA compliant, workflow management, patie...

Categories: Customer Success, Medical, Allergy EMR, Cardiology EMR, Claims Management.

Compare specifications

Compare features

Practice fusion: 12 Features

Basic Reports
Data Import/Export
Online Customer Support
Appointment Management
Charting
E-Prescribing
HIPAA Compliant
Medication history
Patient portal
Voice Recognition
Medical
Medical

Sevocity: 8 Features

Appointment Management
Charting
E-Prescribing
E/M Coding
Handwriting Recognition
HIPAA Compliant
Patient portal
Voice Recognition
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
Practice...
ITQlick rating
4.5/5
Score
99/100
Pricing
2.6/10
License pricing
$149 per provider/month
Functionality
41
Compare
Sevocity...
ITQlick rating
4.4/5
Score
90/100
Pricing
5/10
License pricing
$369 per provider/month
Functionality
35
NextGen ...
ITQlick rating
4.5/5
Score
99/100
Pricing
2/10
License pricing
$299 per provider/month
Functionality
20
WebPT
ITQlick rating
4.4/5
Score
98/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
$3 per provider/day
Functionality
30
Review
eClinicalWorks
ITQlick rating
3.4/5
Score
97/100
Pricing
5.2/10
License pricing
$449 per provider/month + 2.9% of practice collections
Functionality
41

Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.