Compare Precursive and Float - Jan 2023

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / Jan 04, 2023

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Precursive or Float?

Precursive is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Float, and Float is rated higher (85/100) than Precursive (58/100). Float offers users more features (5) than Precursive (0). There is a clear winner in this case and it is Float!

Looking for the right Project Resource Management solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Precursive Vs. Float

Precursive: We provide a platform for managing project teams more efficiently, making it much easier to know who is working on what and who is available. This gives an accurate view of future and historical utilization, meaning the results are immensely accurate. Being being both mobile and cloud-based, our software is available everywhere and anywhere.

Float: Having worked in ad agencies big and small since the mid-2000's, our team were constantly challenged with the age-old question: who's working on what and when? With multiple projects, shifting deadlines, changing availabilities and a range of skill sets, we needed a tool that could centralize all of this information and handle a team in constant fl...

Who is more expensive? Precursive or Float?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Project Resource Management software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Precursive and Float.

Precursive price starts at $23.06 per user/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 Precursive is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Project Resource Management software. Float price starts at $6 per user/month , When comparing Float to its competitors, the software is rated 4 - lower than the average Project Resource Management software cost.

Bottom line: Precursive is more expensive than Float.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Precursive Vs. Float based on some of the most important and required Project Resource Management features.

Precursive: We are still working to collect the list of features for Precursive.

Float: Project Management, Project Budgeting, Project Billing, Cash flow/cash budget, Forecasting.

Target customer size

Precursive's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, and Float's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.



Precursive

ITQlick rating
(3.8/5)

starts at $23.06 per user/month

Precursive is a trending cloud-based Project Management software, it is designed to support small, medium and large size business. Precursive received a rating of 3.8 from ITQlick team. The software cost is con...

Categories: File Sharing, Expense Tracking, Issue Management, Professional Services Automation.

Float

ITQlick rating
(4.5/5)

starts at $6 per user/month

Float is a resource management software designed to help firms and agencies to manage and keep track of their projects.

Categories: Budgeting & CPM, Team Collaboration, Demand Forecasting / Replenishment, Scheduling, Materiel Forecasting.

Compare specifications

Compare features

Precursive: 0 Features

We are working to collect the list of features

Float: 5 Features

Project Management
Project Budgeting
Project Billing
Cash flow/cash budget
Forecasting
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
Precursive
ITQlick rating
3.8/5
Score
58/100
Pricing
6/10
License pricing
$23.06 per user/month
Functionality
8
Compare
Float
ITQlick rating
4.5/5
Score
85/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
$6 per user/month
Functionality
15
Review
Hub Plan...
ITQlick rating
4.2/5
Score
85/100
Pricing
2.8/10
License pricing
$7 per resource/month
Functionality
15
Moovila
ITQlick rating
4.6/5
Score
82/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
$24 per user/month
Functionality
15
Innate R...
ITQlick rating
3.5/5
Score
81/100
Pricing
6.8/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
5

Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.