Shlomi Lavi / May 17, 2023We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Rcopia is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Procentive, and Rcopia is rated higher (92/100) than Procentive (82/100). Procentive offers users more features (3) than Rcopia (2).
Looking for the right Electronic Health Records (EHR) solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
Therapy Brands: Therapy Brands is a collection of the best of the best practice management, Telehealth, and data collection tools. Our team is here to help you expand the reach and impact of your practice.
DrFirst, Inc.: Founded in 2000 and headquartered in Rockville, Maryland, DrFirst pioneers software solutions and services that provide real-time access to patient data, improve communication and collaboration at the point of care and across the patient’s circle of caregivers, and enhance the doctor’s clinical view of the patient to help drive better health outcom...
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Electronic Health Records (EHR) software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Procentive and DrFirst Rcopia.
Procentive price starts at $40 per user/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 Procentive is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Electronic Health Records (EHR) software. DrFirst Rcopia price starts at $799 per year , When comparing DrFirst Rcopia to its competitors, the software is rated 4 - lower than the average Electronic Health Records (EHR) software cost.
Bottom line: Procentive cost is around the same cost of DrFirst Rcopia.
We've compared Procentive Vs. Rcopia based on some of the most important and required Electronic Health Records (EHR) features.
Procentive: Billing & Invoicing, Scheduling, Employee Performance Management.
DrFirst Rcopia: E-Prescribing, Medication history.
Procentive serves a wide range of customers in the behavioral health and human services industries. and DrFirst Rcopia's target customer size include: Large business.
starts at $40 per user/month
Procentive is a powerful electronic health record (EHR) and practice management software designed for behavioral health and human services providers. With features like scheduling, documentation, billing, and r...
Compare Pricing| ITQlick Score: | 82/100 |
|---|---|
| ITQlick Rating: |
|
| Pricing: | 4/10 - average cost |
| Category: | Electronic Health Records (EHR) -> Procentive review |
| Company: | Therapy Brands |
| Pricing: | starts at $40 per user/month |
| Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
| Platforms: | Mobile, Cloud |
| Links: | Procentive review, Procentive pricing, Procentive alternatives |
| ITQlick Score: | 92/100 |
|---|---|
| ITQlick Rating: |
|
| Pricing: | 4/10 - average cost |
| Category: | E-Prescribing -> Rcopia review |
| Company: | DrFirst, Inc. |
| Pricing: | starts at $799 per year |
| Typical customers: | Large business |
| Platforms: | Desktop, Mobile, Cloud |
| Links: | Rcopia review, Rcopia pricing, Rcopia alternatives |
Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.