Compare Procore and Construction Imaging - Jan 2023

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / Jan 01, 2023

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Procore or Construction Imaging?

Construction Imaging is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Procore, and Procore is rated higher (99/100) than Construction Imaging (84/100). Procore offers users more features (17) than Construction Imaging (10). There is a clear winner in this case and it is Procore!

Looking for the right Construction solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Procore Vs. Viewpoint Construction Software

Procore: People like to use Procore. That’s a simple statement, and it might not seem obvious to you yet. But what if your organization buys construction project management software, and your project team doesn’t want to use it? What happens if the software actually makes things worse?

Viewpoint Construction Software: Viewpoint Construction Software has translated over 30 years of intense focus and collaboration with the construction industry into a rock-solid software platform that helps construction professionals efficiently manage all areas of finance and operations.San Antonio, TX – March 19th, 2013 – Viewpoint Construction Software®, providing construction ...

Who is more expensive? Procore or Construction Imaging?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Construction software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Procore and Construction Imaging.

Procore price starts at $667 per month , On a scale between 1 to 10 Procore is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Construction software. Construction Imaging accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Procore is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Construction software.

Bottom line: Construction Imaging is more expensive than Procore.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Procore Vs. Construction Imaging based on some of the most important and required Construction features.

Procore: this software is considered "feature-rich" with more than 10 important features, here is a partial list: Document Management, Issue Tracking, Project Management, Scheduling, Mobile Access, Accounting Management, Bid Comparison, Bidding.

Construction Imaging: Change Orders, Contract Management, Cost Management, Document Management, Equipment Management.

Target customer size

Procore is excellent for mid-sized and enterprise degree building business. Construction Imaging is best for large enterprises and small to mid-sized businesses in the construction business.



Procore

ITQlick rating
(4.5/5)

starts at $667 per month

Procore is a cloud-based construction management solution that is developed to be used by businesses in the construction industry as well as by the individual professionals in the construction industries. The s...

Categories: Construction, Capital Program Management, Concrete Cost Estimating, Construction Apps.

Construction Imaging

ITQlick rating
(3.8/5)

Construction Imaging is a software solution that provides improved workflow and integrated content management that minimizes overhead and costs. The software also raises productivity and improves efficiency. Th...

Categories: Construction, Mechanical and HVAC Estimating.

Compare specifications

Compare features

Procore: 17 Features

Document Management
Issue Tracking
Project Management
Scheduling
Mobile Access
Accounting Management
Bid Comparison
Bidding
Change Orders
Contract Management
Document Management
Estimating
Project Management
Punch List
RFIs/Submittals
Scheduling
Service Management

Construction Imaging: 10 Features

Change Orders
Contract Management
Cost Management
Document Management
Equipment Management
Estimating
Procurement
Project Management
RFIs/Submittals
Scheduling
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
Procore
ITQlick rating
4.5/5
Score
99/100
Pricing
2/10
License pricing
$667 per month
Functionality
33
Compare
Construc...
ITQlick rating
3.8/5
Score
84/100
Pricing
9.8/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
12
PlanGrid
ITQlick rating
4.6/5
Score
98/100
Pricing
2.6/10
License pricing
$39 per user/month
Functionality
16
BuilderTREND
ITQlick rating
4.5/5
Score
97/100
Pricing
2/10
License pricing
$99 per month
Functionality
31
CoConstruct
ITQlick rating
4.7/5
Score
97/100
Pricing
2/10
License pricing
$99 per month
Functionality
23

Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.