Shlomi Lavi / Feb 28, 2023We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
ProfitKeeper is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Basecamp, and Basecamp is rated higher (98/100) than ProfitKeeper (62/100). Basecamp offers users more features (5) than ProfitKeeper (0). There is a clear winner in this case and it is Basecamp!
Looking for the right Payroll solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
ProfitKeeper: ProfitKeeper's profitability platform has proven to increase profits and reduce the cost of managing your franchise system. Learn more about how our solutions can help your business. Most franchisors realize the benefit of collecting their franchisees' financial statements. However, many have a difficult time with the administrative burden of coll...
Basecamp: Basecamp is a company spread out across 26 different cities around the world. Started the business back in 1999 (used to be called 37signals, but recently changed the name of the business to Basecamp, to match the name of their most popular product).
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Payroll software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for ProfitKeeper and Basecamp.
ProfitKeeper price starts at $6 per user/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 ProfitKeeper is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Payroll software. Basecamp price starts at $11 per user/month , When comparing Basecamp to its competitors, the software is rated 4 - lower than the average Payroll software cost.
Bottom line: ProfitKeeper is more expensive than Basecamp.
We've compared ProfitKeeper Vs. Basecamp based on some of the most important and required Payroll features.
ProfitKeeper: We are still working to collect the list of features for ProfitKeeper.
Basecamp: Document Management, Project Management, Resource Management, Scheduling, Task Management.
ProfitKeeper's typical customers include: SMBs,
Basecamp Project Management software serves a wide range of customers from various industries.
starts at $6 per user/month
ProfitKeeper is a growing cloud-based Accounting-Finance software, it is designed to support small and medium size business. ProfitKeeper received a rating of 3.6 from ITQlick team. The software cost is conside...
Compare Pricing| ITQlick Score: | 62/100 |
|---|---|
| ITQlick Rating: |
|
| Pricing: | 6/10 - average cost |
| Category: | Payroll -> ProfitKeeper review |
| Company: | ProfitKeeper |
| Pricing: | starts at $6 per user/month |
| Typical customers: | SMBs |
| Platforms: | Desktop, Cloud |
| Links: | ProfitKeeper review, ProfitKeeper pricing, ProfitKeeper alternatives |
| ITQlick Score: | 98/100 |
|---|---|
| ITQlick Rating: |
|
| Pricing: | 4/10 - average cost |
| Category: | Project Management -> Basecamp review |
| Company: | Basecamp |
| Pricing: | starts at $11 per user/month |
| Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
| Platforms: | Desktop, Mobile, Cloud |
| Links: | Basecamp review, Basecamp pricing, Basecamp alternatives |
Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.