Shlomi Lavi /
Oct 04, 2022
We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - ProStaff or OnBlick ATS?
OnBlick ATS is more expensive to implement (TCO) than ProStaff, and ProStaff is rated higher (90/100) than OnBlick ATS (80/100). OnBlick ATS offers users more features (5) than ProStaff (0).
Looking for the right Recruiting Agency solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
BIS Vs. Onblick
BIS: At BIS, we connect business know-how to superior technology, leading to exceptional results and value-added opportunities for our clients. Our long-term commitment to clients is all about building a special understanding so that we are ideally positioned to create and deliver optimal strategic solutions... so that we help you reach and go beyond wh...
Onblick: OnBlick HR keeps your company compliant by digitizing I9 Form, I-983 Form and PAFs. Based on your hiring practices it also recommends matching SOC codes and Wage levels for the LCA.
Who is more expensive? ProStaff or OnBlick ATS?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Recruiting Agency software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for ProStaff and OnBlick ATS.
ProStaff price starts at $60,000 per license , On a scale between 1 to 10 ProStaff is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Recruiting Agency software. OnBlick ATS price Has a free version , When comparing OnBlick ATS to its competitors, the software is rated 6 - similar to the average Recruiting Agency software cost.
Bottom line: OnBlick ATS is more expensive than ProStaff.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared ProStaff Vs. OnBlick ATS based on some of the most important and required Recruiting Agency features.
ProStaff: We are still working to collect the list of features for ProStaff.
OnBlick ATS: Workflow, Recruiting Management, Resume Database, Applicant Tracking, Configurable Workflow.
Target customer size
Customers of the software include businesses of all sizes and a diverse range of types. and OnBlick ATS's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.