Compare PX3000 and Staffcare - Feb 2023

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - PX3000 or Staffcare?

PX3000 is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Staffcare, and PX3000 is rated higher (90/100) than Staffcare (79/100).

Looking for the right Benefits Administration solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Penad Pension Services Vs. Staffcare

Penad Pension Services: Founded in 1983, Penad is Canada’s pension administration specialist and a leading supplier of pension and benefit software systems to employers, financial institutions, and governments around the world. Penad takes care of the pension needs of plan sponsors across Canada and internationally with first-tier plan administration, consulting and ac...

Staffcare: Staffcare Limited was established in 2004 to focus on providing employee benefits communication software. The Company is well established with proven and accepted technologies; an expanding customer base which provides recurring revenues; and an experienced management team with a successful track record in developing market leading technology solut...

Who is more expensive? PX3000 or Staffcare?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Benefits Administration software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for PX3000 and Staffcare.

PX3000 accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 PX3000 is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Benefits Administration software. Staffcare accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 PX3000 is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Benefits Administration software.

Bottom line: PX3000 is more expensive than Staffcare.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared PX3000 Vs. Staffcare based on some of the most important and required Benefits Administration features.

PX3000: We are still working to collect the list of features for PX3000.

Staffcare: We are still working to collect the list of features for Staffcare.

Target customer size

PX3000's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, The software is a useful solution for businesses of all sizes and a diverse range of types.