Shlomi Lavi /
Apr 27, 2022
We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - Qgiv or eTapestry?
eTapestry is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Qgiv, and eTapestry is rated higher (91/100) than Qgiv (85/100). eTapestry offers users more features (5) than Qgiv (0).
Looking for the right Donation Management solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
Qgiv Vs. Blackbaud
Qgiv: Qgiv is working to make accepting online, mobile and in-person donations easier for nonprofit, faith-based and political organizations. We're passionate about connecting your organization with the next generation of donors.
Blackbaud: Serving the nonprofit and education sectors for 30 years, Blackbaud (NASDAQ: BLKB) combines technology and expertise to help organizations achieve their missions. Blackbaud works with more than 27,000 customers in over 60 countries that support higher education, healthcare, human services, arts and culture, faith, the environment, independent K-12 ...
Who is more expensive? Qgiv or eTapestry?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Donation Management software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Qgiv and eTapestry.
Qgiv price starts at $25 per month , On a scale between 1 to 10 Qgiv is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Donation Management software. eTapestry price starts at $99 per month , When comparing eTapestry to its competitors, the software is rated 4 - lower than the average Donation Management software cost.
Bottom line: eTapestry is more expensive than Qgiv.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared Qgiv Vs. eTapestry based on some of the most important and required Donation Management features.
Qgiv: We are still working to collect the list of features for Qgiv.
eTapestry: Campaign Management, Contact Management, Email Marketing, Social Media, Email.
Target customer size
Customers of the software include businesses of all sizes and types. Customers of the software include businesses of all sizes and types.