FACS Project Controller - Top Competitors (Aug 2022)

FACS Project Controller Review
ITQlick Score: 86/100
ITQlick Rating:
Pricing: 7.6/10 - high cost
Category: Construction -> FACS Project Controller review -> FACS Project Controller competitors
Ranking:Ranked 40 out of 443 Construction systems
Company: Field Automated Communication Systems, LLC
Typical customers: Start up, Small business, Medium business, Large business
Platforms: Desktop, Mobile, Cloud
Links: FACS Project Controller review, FACS Project Controller pricing guide
Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / updated: Aug 25, 2022

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

FACS Project Controller vs. Alternatives in 2024

FACS Project Controller vs. Autodesk Construction Cloud

FACS Project Controller offers features like Documents & Forms, Reports & Dashboards, and Integrated Search, which are unavailable in Autodesk Construction Cloud. On the other hand, Autodesk Construction Cloud offers Design Collaboration, Coordination, and Model Conditioning, which are unavailable in FACS Project Controller.

The license cost information for FACS Project Controller is unavailable, while that of Autodesk Construction Cloud starts at £576 per year and £48 per month with a free trial. Both FACS Project Controller and Autodesk Construction Cloud are cloud-based construction systems.

In contrast to Autodesk Construction Cloud, which is tailored to general contractors, construction managers, project managers, superintendents, subcontractors, architects, engineers, and owners, FACS Project Controller is primarily aimed at owners, construction managers, and contractors.

FACS Project Controller (founded in 2001) is privately held, while Autodesk Construction Cloud is Publicly traded on the Nasdaq under the ADSK symbol.

FACS Project Controller vs. Contractor Foreman

FACS Project Controller offers features like Multiple custom roles, Real time notifications, and Mobile, which Contractor Foreman does not provide. On the other hand, Contractor Foreman provides features like Projects, Daily Logs, and Scheduling, which are missing in FACS Project Controller.

The license cost information for FACS Project Controller is unavailable, while that of Contractor Foreman starts at $49 per month with a free trial. Both FACS Project Controller and Contractor Foreman are cloud-based construction systems.

Owners, construction managers, and contractors are the primary audience for FACS Project Controller, while Contractor Foreman is ideal for small and medium-sized businesses who are either new to construction software or are weary of paying too much for their present solution.

Contractor Foreman, like FACS Project Controller, is a privately owned system that serves contractors in 75+ countries. Customer support for both construction systems can be reached in three ways: through Phone Support, Email/Help desk, or Live chat.

FACS Project Controller vs. Procore

Both construction systems provide Project Management. Procore offers features like Invoice Management, Trust & Security, and Quality & Safety, which FACS Project Controller does not. FACS Project Controller provides an Integration with PlanGrid, reports and dashboards, and an integrated search unavailable in Procore. The license cost information for both construction systems is unavailable. Both FACS Project Controller and Procore are cloud-based construction systems.

Procore links all participants of any construction project team, including owners, general contractors, and subcontractors, from the field to the office, whereas FACS Project Controller is primarily aimed at owners, construction managers, and contractors.

FACS Project Controller (founded in 2001) is privately held, while Procore (founded in 2002) is publicly traded on the NYSE under the PCOR symbol with over 2 million registered users across the globe. In terms of available support channels, Procore offers a FAQ section and phone support, whereas FACS Project Controller offers a phone support option in addition to an email/help desk and live chat.

FACS Project Controller alternatives - for small & large Company

Here are the top 4 alternatives to FACS Project Controller that are worth checking out: Procore for SMBs, PlanGrid for large size business, BuilderTREND for growing companies, and Raken for low budget organizations.

ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
Score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100 score, based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing pricing Score is a 1 to 10 score, based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality
Review
Compare
FACS Pro...
ITQlick rating
4.5/5
Score
86/100
Pricing
7.6/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
38
Best for SMBs
Procore
ITQlick rating
4.5/5
Score
99/100
Pricing
2/10
License pricing
$667 per month
Functionality
33
Best for Enterprise
PlanGrid
ITQlick rating
4.6/5
Score
98/100
Pricing
2.6/10
License pricing
$39 per user/month
Functionality
16
Growing
BuilderTREND
ITQlick rating
4.5/5
Score
97/100
Pricing
2/10
License pricing
$99 per month
Functionality
31
Free version
Raken
ITQlick rating
4.7/5
Score
95/100
Pricing
2/10
License pricing
$15 per user/month
Functionality
5
Review


Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.