Shlomi Lavi /
Jul 25, 2022
We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - RackNap or Asset4000?
Asset4000 is more expensive to implement (TCO) than RackNap, and Asset4000 is rated higher (81/100) than RackNap (58/100). Asset4000 offers users more features (16) than RackNap (0).
Looking for the right Private cloud solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
RackNap Vs. Real Asset Management (RAM)
RackNap: RackNap is a Cloud Service Delivery and end-to-end Business Cycle Automation platform for cloud, datacenter, telco and hosting industry. Enabling providers to sell cloud services on their own infrastructure, as well as via third party providers like Microsoft, Amazon, Google and IBM. RackNap covers all facets of business operations – sales and mark...
Real Asset Management (RAM): Real Asset Management Plc (RAM), established in 1981 as Britannia Business Services Ltd, is a leading supplier of fixed asset management and transport and logistics software solutions and services. Throughout the last 30 years, its products have been implemented by more than 3,000 organisations in over 70 countries and used across all industry sect...
Who is more expensive? RackNap or Asset4000?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Private cloud software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for RackNap and Asset4000.
RackNap price starts at $500 per user/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 RackNap is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Private cloud software. Asset4000 accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 RackNap is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Private cloud software.
Bottom line: Asset4000 is more expensive than RackNap.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared RackNap Vs. Asset4000 based on some of the most important and required Private cloud features.
RackNap: We are still working to collect the list of features for RackNap.
Asset4000: Budgeting & Forecasting, Fixed-Assets, Project-Accounting, Tax compliance, Cost Analysis.
Target customer size
RackNap's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, RAM supports over 50,000 end users around the world, and the Series4000 software has been adopted by over 3,000 organizations in more than 70 countries.