Compare RealPage Commercial and Coda Financials - Apr 2022

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / Apr 25, 2022

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - RealPage Commercial or Coda Financials?

Coda Financials is more expensive to implement (TCO) than RealPage Commercial, and RealPage Commercial is rated higher (94/100) than Coda Financials (85/100). Coda Financials offers users more features (15) than RealPage Commercial (8).

Looking for the right Property Management solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

RealPage Vs. UNIT4 Business Software

RealPage: RealPage is a leading provider of comprehensive property management software solutions in the multifamily, commercial, and single-family rental housing industries. RealPage helps apartment management companies and property owners increase efficiency, decrease expenses, enhance the resident experience and generate more revenue. Utilizing its innovat...

UNIT4 Business Software: UNIT4 is a global business software and services company that creates, provides and supports software – delivered via the cloud or on-premise – for a market sector it calls ‘Businesses Living IN Change’. Its solutions are aimed at helping these dynamic public sector and commercial services organizations to manage their business needs and embrace ch...

Who is more expensive? RealPage Commercial or Coda Financials?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Property Management software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for RealPage Commercial and Coda Financials.

RealPage Commercial price starts at $5.83 per month , On a scale between 1 to 10 RealPage Commercial is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Property Management software. Coda Financials price starts at $10 per month , When comparing Coda Financials to its competitors, the software is rated 8 - higher than the average Property Management software cost.

Bottom line: Coda Financials is more expensive than RealPage Commercial.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared RealPage Commercial Vs. Coda Financials based on some of the most important and required Property Management features.

RealPage Commercial: Billing & Invoicing, Tax compliance, Project Portfolio Management, Payment Management, Maintenance Overview, Vacancy Dashboard, Expense Management, Contact Management.

Coda Financials: Accounts Payable, Accounts Receivable, Audit Trail, Billing & Invoicing, Budgeting & Forecasting.

Target customer size

RealPage Commercial's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, Coda Financials was developed to support businesses all around the world.



RealPage Commercial

ITQlick rating
(3.6/5)

starts at $5.83 per month

RealPage Commercial is a cloud-based accounting software that enables administrators to manage the corporate accounting of their organization and its affiliates, as well as gaining visibility into daily workflo...

Categories: Accounting & Finance, Billing & Invoicing, Payment Processing, Tax Preparation.

Coda Financials

ITQlick rating
(4.3/5)

starts at $10 per month

Unit4 Financials or formerly known as Coda Financials is a cloud-based or on-premise financial and accounting management solution for medium to large companies.

Categories: Billing & Invoicing, Budgeting & CPM, Core Accounting, Financial reporting, Fixed Asset Accounting.

Compare specifications

Compare features

RealPage Commercial: 8 Features

Billing & Invoicing
Tax compliance
Project Portfolio Management
Payment Management
Maintenance Overview
Vacancy Dashboard
Expense Management
Contact Management

Coda Financials: 15 Features

Accounts Payable
Accounts Receivable
Audit Trail
Billing & Invoicing
Budgeting & Forecasting
Cash Flow
Credit Card Processing
E-commerce
Fixed-Assets
Fund-Accounting
Multi-Currency
Project-Accounting
Purchase Orders
Sales Reporting
Tax compliance
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
RealPage...
ITQlick rating
3.6/5
Score
94/100
Pricing
4.6/10
License pricing
$5.83 per month
Functionality
19
Compare
Coda Fin...
ITQlick rating
4.3/5
Score
85/100
Pricing
8.4/10
License pricing
$10 per month
Functionality
28
Buildium
ITQlick rating
4.5/5
Score
100/100
Pricing
2.8/10
License pricing
$50 per month
Functionality
25
Propertyware
ITQlick rating
3.6/5
Score
96/100
Pricing
7/10
License pricing
$1 per unit/month
Functionality
25
AppFolio
ITQlick rating
4.5/5
Score
95/100
Pricing
3/10
License pricing
$1.40 per unit/month
Functionality
32

Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.