Shlomi Lavi /
Apr 16, 2021
We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - RealTime-CTMS or eAdjudication?
eAdjudication is more expensive to implement (TCO) than RealTime-CTMS, and eAdjudication is rated with the same score (62/100) as RealTime-CTMS (62/100).
Looking for the right Clinical Trial Management solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
RealTime-CTMS Vs. Ethical GmbH
RealTime-CTMS: RealTime was built by sites for sites! That's right... CRCs, regulatory specialists, recruitment specialists, business development personnel, sites directors, even investigators have helped us build a tool that makes everyone's job more efficient and brings the entire site together. RealTime does everything that other systems do (and more), but Rea...
Ethical GmbH: Ethical Cloud Software Services for Data Management in Clinical Trials. Ethical supports Endpoint Adjudication, Electronic Data Capture and eCOA / ePRO Patient Diaries with the user-friendly professional software solution designed to ease the Clinical Data Management. The Cloud Software platforms are GxP / 21 CFR part 11 validated and have been des...
Who is more expensive? RealTime-CTMS or eAdjudication?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Clinical Trial Management software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for RealTime-CTMS and eAdjudication.
RealTime-CTMS price starts at $295 per user/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 RealTime-CTMS is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Clinical Trial Management software. eAdjudication accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 RealTime-CTMS is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Clinical Trial Management software.
Bottom line: eAdjudication is more expensive than RealTime-CTMS.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared RealTime-CTMS Vs. eAdjudication based on some of the most important and required Clinical Trial Management features.
RealTime-CTMS: We are still working to collect the list of features for RealTime-CTMS.
eAdjudication: We are still working to collect the list of features for eAdjudication.
Target customer size
RealTime-CTMS's typical customers include: SMBs, The eAdjudication software is designed for study leaders and its members, data managers and adjudication committee members in the wide-ranging industries of clinical research organizations, pharmaceuticals, biotechnology, academic research organizations, and more.