Compare RecoverPoint and SAP In-Memory Computing - May 2022

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / May 20, 2022

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - RecoverPoint or SAP In-Memory Computing?

SAP In-Memory Computing is more expensive to implement (TCO) than RecoverPoint, and RecoverPoint is rated higher (72/100) than SAP In-Memory Computing (62/100). Both tools offer the same amount of features.

Looking for the right System solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

EMC Vs. SAP

EMC : EMC is a global leader in enabling businesses and service providers to transform their operations and deliver information technology as a service (ITaaS).EMC builds information infrastructures and virtual infrastructures to help people and businesses around the world unleash the power of their digital information. EMC offerings in backup and recove...

SAP: SAP ® AG is German software corporation that makes enterprise software to manage business operations and customer relations. SAP ® is the market leader in enterprise application software. The company's best-known software products are its enterprise resource planning application (SAP ® ERP), its enterpr...

Who is more expensive? RecoverPoint or SAP In-Memory Computing (HANA)?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of System software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for RecoverPoint and SAP In-Memory Computing (HANA).

RecoverPoint accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 RecoverPoint is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of System software. SAP In-Memory Computing (HANA) accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 RecoverPoint is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of System software.

Bottom line: SAP In-Memory Computing (HANA) is more expensive than RecoverPoint.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared RecoverPoint Vs. SAP In-Memory Computing based on some of the most important and required System features.

RecoverPoint: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support.

SAP In-Memory Computing (HANA): Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support.

Target customer size

RecoverPoint's typical customers include: Medium and large size businesses, SAP HANA is perfect for industries that are looking for a way to accelerate their business processes, data processing and analytics.

RecoverPoint

ITQlick rating
(4.3/5)

RecoverPoint is an award-winning cloud-based System software, it is designed to support medium and large size business. RecoverPoint received a rating of 4.3 from ITQlick team. The software cost is considered a...

Categories: Data analysis, Data Center Management.

SAP In-Memory Computing

ITQlick rating
(4.3/5)

SAP HANA is an in-memory computing platform that can help users to increase the speed of business processes, analytics and sentiment data processing dramatically. Users can run their business in real-time and g...

Categories: In memory processing, Database Management.

Compare specifications

Compare features

RecoverPoint: 3 Features

Data Import/Export
Basic Reports
Online Customer Support

SAP In-Memory Computing (HANA): 3 Features

Data Import/Export
Basic Reports
Online Customer Support
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
RecoverPoint
ITQlick rating
4.3/5
Score
72/100
Pricing
3.4/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
5
Compare
SAP In-M...
ITQlick rating
4.3/5
Score
62/100
Pricing
4.2/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
5
FoxPro
ITQlick rating
3.4/5
Score
87/100
Pricing
4.4/10
License pricing
$2.50 per month
Functionality
4
Review
WebSpher...
ITQlick rating
3.8/5
Score
86/100
Pricing
7/10
License pricing
$309 per license
Functionality
4
SQLyog
ITQlick rating
3.1/5
Score
85/100
Pricing
4.2/10
License pricing
$299 per license
Functionality
4
Review

Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.