Shlomi Lavi /
Jul 13, 2022
We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - Runcard or Chempax?
Chempax is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Runcard, and Chempax is rated with the same score (82/100) as Runcard (82/100). Chempax offers users more features (10) than Runcard (0).
Looking for the right Manufacturing Execution Software (MES) solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
Intraratio Vs. Datacor, Inc
Intraratio: Our Mission is to deliver an exceptional Manufacturing Execution System and Yield Management platform that drives innovation and operational excellence. By leveraging automation and data capture technologies on the production floor and engineering lab, we bring traceability, IoT integration and data driven decisions to your manufacturing operations...
Datacor, Inc: Datacor is the leading developer of business management software solutions for the Process Manufacturing and Chemical Distribution Industries. Our advancements in Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) and Customer Relationship Management (CRM) technology deliver flexible solutions for companies of all sizes. Our products are proven to solve industry ...
Who is more expensive? Runcard or Chempax?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Manufacturing Execution Software (MES) software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Runcard and Chempax.
Runcard price starts at $75,000 per user/year , On a scale between 1 to 10 Runcard is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Manufacturing Execution Software (MES) software. Chempax price starts at $4,000 per license , When comparing Chempax to its competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Manufacturing Execution Software (MES) software cost.
Bottom line: Runcard cost is around the same cost of Chempax.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared Runcard Vs. Chempax based on some of the most important and required Manufacturing Execution Software (MES) features.
Runcard: We are still working to collect the list of features for Runcard.
Chempax: CRM Integration, Customizable Reporting, ERP Integration, Inventory Optimization, Multi-Language.
Target customer size
Runcard's typical customers include: SMBs, Chempax is best suited for the Process Manufacturing and Chemical Distribution industry and addresses such sectors as Lubricant & Water Treatment manufacturers, Textile & Industrial Chemicals, Pharmaceuticals, Mining & Mineral companies as well as Paints and Adhesive manufacturers to name a few.