Shlomi Lavi / Jul 14, 2020
We publish unbiased reviews, our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. Learn more in our advertiser disclosure.
Sentient is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Hubstaff, Hubstaff is rated higher (94/100) than Sentient (62/100). Hubstaff offers more features (10) to their users than Sentient (0). There is a clear winner in this case and it is Hubstaff!
Looking for the right Employee Management solution for your business? buyers like you are primarily concerned about the real total implementation cost (TCO), full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, pros and cons. In this article we compare between the 2 software products:
Accelerite: Accelerite’s software suite of cloud, IoT solutions and advanced endpoint management make it easy for enterprises to simplify and secure today’s complex, ever-evolving infrastructure. Fortune 500s, SMEs, operators, service providers and VARs around the world rely on Accelerite products to secure connected enterprises from a single pane view, quickl...
Hubstaff: We provide a SAAS solution for Employee Productivity and time tracking. We specialize in servicing companies that have many virtual employees or a service related business where you must communicate hours worked to your clients. Hubstaff helps make this process automatic and accurate providing screenshots and exact detail of the work completed.
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Employee Management software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance & support and other related services. When calculating the TCO it's important to add all of these "hidden cost" as well. We prepared a TCO calculator for Sentient and Hubstaff.
Sentient price Starting from $49 per month , on a scale between 1 to 10 Sentient is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Employee Management software. Hubstaff price starts at $7 per user/month , when comparing Hubstaff to their competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Employee Management software cost.
Bottom line: Sentient is more expensive than Hubstaff.
As with any business software solutions, it’s important to consider the features & functionality. The tool should support the processes, workflows, reports and needs that matter to your team. To help you evaluate this, we've compared Sentient Vs. Hubstaff based on some of the most important and required Employee Management features. Sentient: We are still working to collect the list of features for Sentient. Hubstaff: Mobile Access, Billing & Invoicing, Automatic Time Capture, Hourly Employee Tracking, Multiple Pay Rates.
Sentient's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, The software is a useful solution for businesses of all sizes and a variety of types.
Starting from $49 per month
Sentient is a growing cloud-based Content Management software, it is designed to support small, medium and large size business. Sentient received a rating of 3.5 from ITQlick team. The software cost is consider...
Compare Pricing| ITQlick Score: | 62/100 |
|---|---|
| ITQlick Rating: | (3.5/5) |
| Pricing: | 4/10 - average cost |
| Category: | Employee Management -> Sentient |
| Company: | Accelerite |
| Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
| Platforms: | Desktop, Mobile |
| Links: | Sentient review, Sentient pricing, Sentient alternatives |
| ITQlick Score: | 94/100 |
|---|---|
| ITQlick Rating: | (4.6/5) |
| Pricing: | 2/10 - low cost |
| Category: | Employee Management -> Hubstaff |
| Company: | Hubstaff |
| Pricing: | starts at $7 per user/month |
| Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
| Platforms: | Cloud |
| Links: | Hubstaff review, Hubstaff pricing, Hubstaff alternatives |
Shlomi holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information System Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 15 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant, and implementation expert for small, medium and large size (global) companies.