Compare Strategic Performance and Balanced Scorecard - Mar 2022

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / Mar 12, 2022

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Strategic Performance or Balanced Scorecard?

Balanced Scorecard is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Strategic Performance, and Balanced Scorecard is rated higher (92/100) than Strategic Performance (55/100). Balanced Scorecard offers users more features (6) than Strategic Performance (3).

Looking for the right Data Management solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

SAS Vs. MGI Solution

SAS: SAS helps organizations anticipate business opportunities, empower action and drive impact. We do this through advanced analytics that turn data about customers, performance, financials and more into meaningful information. The result? Fact-based decisions for undeniable bottom line impact – this is how we transform the way our customers do busines...

MGI Solution: MGI Solutions is a management consulting and custom software development firm specializing in corporate performance management (CPM) solutions. The company was founded byTony Ciotti in 1994 to consult high net worth investors on private equity investments and to consult growth companies on capital formation, corporate financial strategies, merg...

Who is more expensive? Strategic Performance or Balanced Scorecard?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Data Management software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Strategic Performance and Balanced Scorecard.

Strategic Performance accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Strategic Performance Management is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Data Management software. Balanced Scorecard price starts at $125 per user/month , When comparing Balanced Scorecard to its competitors, the software is rated 8 - higher than the average Data Management software cost.

Bottom line: Balanced Scorecard is more expensive than Strategic Performance.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Strategic Performance Vs. Balanced Scorecard based on some of the most important and required Data Management features.

Strategic Performance: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support.

Balanced Scorecard: Basic Reports, Dashboard, Data Import/Export, Online Customer Support, Data analysis.

Target customer size

Strategic Performance's typical customers include: Start up, Small business, Medium business, Large business, Customers of the software include small and medium businesses from a variety of industries.



Strategic Performance

ITQlick rating
(4.3/5)

Strategic Performance Management is a leading cloud-based Data Management software, it is designed to support small, medium and large size business. Strategic Performance Management received a rating of 4.3 fro...

Categories: Data integration.

Balanced Scorecard

ITQlick rating
(4.5/5)

starts at $125 per user/month

Balanced Scorecard is a cloud-based and on-premise strategic planning & management system tailored for small size and medium businesses. The software helps organizations to communicate their goals, align their ...

Categories: Budgeting & CPM, Business Intelligence, Dashboards & KPIs, Data analysis, Reporting.

Compare specifications

Compare features

Strategic Performance: 3 Features

Data Import/Export
Basic Reports
Online Customer Support

Balanced Scorecard: 6 Features

Basic Reports
Dashboard
Data Import/Export
Online Customer Support
Data analysis
Project Collaboration
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
Strategi...
ITQlick rating
4.3/5
Score
55/100
Pricing
4/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
4
Compare
Balanced...
ITQlick rating
4.5/5
Score
92/100
Pricing
8/10
License pricing
$125 per user/month
Functionality
16
Akula Ve...
ITQlick rating
4.3/5
Score
92/100
Pricing
6.8/10
License pricing
$25 per month
Functionality
4
Informat...
ITQlick rating
4.6/5
Score
92/100
Pricing
5.6/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
5
Arcsight...
ITQlick rating
4.3/5
Score
91/100
Pricing
5.2/10
License pricing
$4416.29 per month
Functionality
6

Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.