Shlomi Lavi / Mar 11, 2022We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
SugarSync Manager is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Box, and Box is rated higher (92/100) than SugarSync Manager (50/100). Box offers users more features (8) than SugarSync Manager (2). There is a clear winner in this case and it is Box!
Looking for the right File Sharing solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
SugarSync: SugarSync is a free service that helps you sync your life. With a simple download on your computers and mobile devices, you have access to all the Cloud has to offer. SugarSync currently has millions of users worldwide. Brands such as BestBuy, Lenovo, SanDisk, France Telecom-Orange, Korea Telecom and more have selected SugarSync as a partner to bri...
Box.net: Box.net is the maker of Box software that lets you store all of your content online, so you can access, manage and share it from anywhere. Integrate Box with Google Apps and Salesforce and access Box on mobile devices
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of File Sharing software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for SugarSync Manager and Box.
SugarSync Manager price starts at $50 per user/year , On a scale between 1 to 10 SugarSync Manager is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of File Sharing software. Box price starts at $15 per user/month , When comparing Box to its competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average File Sharing software cost.
Bottom line: SugarSync Manager is more expensive than Box.
We've compared SugarSync Manager Vs. Box based on some of the most important and required File Sharing features.
SugarSync Manager: File sharing, Live backups.
Box: Basic Reports, Data Import/Export, Online Customer Support, Version Control, Document Indexing.
SugarSync Manager extends services to any kind of business. Customers of the software include small and medium businesses as well as large enterprises.
starts at $50 per user/year
SugarSync Manager is cloud-based software that synchronises files for backup, access, from diverse operating systems including Android, iOS and Windows. Files can be documents, photos music and movies. Launche...
Compare Pricing| ITQlick Score: | 50/100 |
|---|---|
| ITQlick Rating: |
|
| Pricing: | 4/10 - average cost |
| Category: | File Sharing -> SugarSync Manager review |
| Company: | SugarSync |
| Pricing: | starts at $50 per user/year |
| Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
| Platforms: | Desktop, Mobile, Cloud |
| Links: | SugarSync Manager review, SugarSync Manager pricing, SugarSync Manager alternatives |
| ITQlick Score: | 92/100 |
|---|---|
| ITQlick Rating: |
|
| Pricing: | 2/10 - low cost |
| Category: | Document Management -> Box review |
| Company: | Box.net |
| Pricing: | starts at $15 per user/month |
| Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
| Platforms: | Cloud |
| Links: | Box review, Box pricing, Box alternatives |
Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.