TACTIC Vs Mar-Kov: Side-by-Side Comparison

ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Hosting
Functionality score
Fit small business
Fit medium business
Fit large business
Software review
Compare
TACTIC
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick Score
80/100
Pricing score Pricing score ranges between 1 to 10 while 1 is low TCO and 10 is high TCO (TCO - total cost of ownership: cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
6/10
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Pricing not available
Hosting
NA
Functionality score
20
Fit small business
Fit medium business
Fit large business
Software review
Mar-Kov
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick Score
92/100
Pricing score Pricing score ranges between 1 to 10 while 1 is low TCO and 10 is high TCO (TCO - total cost of ownership: cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
2/10
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Pricing not available
Hosting
On premise and Cloud
Functionality score
29
Fit small business
Fit medium business
Fit large business
Software review
Mar-Kov
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick Score
92/100
Pricing score Pricing score ranges between 1 to 10 while 1 is low TCO and 10 is high TCO (TCO - total cost of ownership: cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
2/10
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Pricing not available
Hosting
On premise and Cloud
Functionality score
29
Fit small business
Fit medium business
Fit large business
Software review
NetSuite
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick Score
92/100
Pricing score Pricing score ranges between 1 to 10 while 1 is low TCO and 10 is high TCO (TCO - total cost of ownership: cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
6.2/10
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Pricing not available
Hosting
On premise
Functionality score
16
Fit small business
Fit medium business
Fit large business
Software review
FACTIVITY
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick Score
91/100
Pricing score Pricing score ranges between 1 to 10 while 1 is low TCO and 10 is high TCO (TCO - total cost of ownership: cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
8/10
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Pricing not available
Hosting
NA
Functionality score
23
Fit small business
Fit medium business
Fit large business
Software review

TACTIC Vs. Mar-Kov: Price & Features - Which is better?

Mar 23, 2019

Looking for the right Manufacturing solution for your business? buyers like you are primarily concerned about the real total implementation cost (TCO), full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, pros and cons. in this article we compare between the 2 software products:

Vendor comparison

Waterloo Manufacturing Software: Waterloo Manufacturing Software develops, markets, sells and supports TACTIC Production Scheduling and Advanced Planning and Scheduling Software. TACTIC explicitly and simultaneously considers limited capacity and limited material. The software both generates detailed shop floor dispatches and plans multiple locations throughout the supply chain. TACTIC’s sophisticated scheduling algorithms and what-if features help manufacturers reduce supply and inventory costs while maintaining or improving customer service.

Mar-Kov software: Mar-Kov software focuses on Process, Batch, and Recipe / Formulation based manufacturers. We believe in best-of-breed solutions, and deliver specialized implementations for each of the following industries: Chemicals Pharmaceuticals Cosmetics Flavor and Fragrance Paints and Coatings Food and Beverage Mar-Kov delivers robust traceability for manufacturers, easing the burden of meeting FDA, HACCP and other regulatory requirements.Modernize your facility by replacing your paper batch records with an integrated electronic batch recording system.

Pricing/cost comparison

The real cost of Manufacturing software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training cost, customization cost, required hardware, and the cost of maintenance & support and other related services. It's critical that you account for all of these costs to gain an understanding of the system's "total cost of ownership". We prepared a total cost calculator for TACTIC Advanced Planning and Scheduling software TCO and Mar-Kov CMS Software total cost to help with the total cost of ownership calculation.

TACTIC Advanced Planning and Scheduling software price Starting from $49 per month , on a scale between 1 to 10 TACTIC Advanced Planning and Scheduling software is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Manufacturing software. Mar-Kov CMS Software accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , on a scale between 1 to 10 TACTIC Advanced Planning and Scheduling software is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Manufacturing software.

Bottom line: TACTIC Advanced Planning and Scheduling software is more expensive than Mar-Kov CMS Software.

Features and functionality

As with any business software solutions, it’s important to consider the features & functionality. The tool should support the processes, workflows, reports and needs that matter to your team. To help you evaluate this, we've compared TACTIC Vs. Mar-Kov based on some of the most important and required Manufacturing features.
TACTIC Advanced Planning and Scheduling software: Production, Production planning, Automated Scheduling, ..
Mar-Kov CMS Software list of features include the following: Inventory Management, Order Processing Management, Sourcing & Procurement, Supplier Management, Warehouse Management, .

Target customer size

TACTIC Advanced Planning and Scheduling software's typical customers include: Small business, Mar-Kov CMS targets Small (100 employees) to Large (more than 1000 employees) companies in several industries including the food, chemical, fragrance, pharmaceutical, flavors, OTC, and cosmetics industries.

TACTIC Advanced Planning and Scheduling software

ITQlick rating
(4.5/5)

Starting from $49 per month

Advanced Production Scheduling software can be of significant benefit in production environments where there are more than two levels in bills of material. Previous scheduling techniques couldn’t delay the star

Categories: Project Planning, Vendor Management, Materiel Planning , Scheduling, Facility Scheduling.

Mar-Kov CMS Software

ITQlick rating
(0/5)

Mar-Kov CMS (Chemical Management System) is a set of software modules that helps with the management and improves the efficiency of formulation, process, and batch based manufacturers. The software helps by aut

Categories: Process Manufacturing, MRP Software, Manufacturing Execution Software (MES), Job Shop, Food Manufacturing.

Compare screenshots

Compare specifications

Compare features

TACTIC Advanced Planning and Scheduling software: 3 Features

Production
Production planning
Automated Scheduling

Mar-Kov CMS Software: 8 Features

Inventory Management
Order Processing Management
Sourcing & Procurement
Supplier Management
Warehouse Management
Document Management
Enterprise Resource Planning
Forecasting