Compare TalentBin and KPA HR - May 2022

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - TalentBin or KPA HR?

KPA HR is more expensive to implement (TCO) than TalentBin, and KPA HR is rated higher (92/100) than TalentBin (80/100). TalentBin offers users more features (6) than KPA HR (0).

Looking for the right Talent Management solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Monster Vs. KPA

Monster: Monster Worldwide, Inc. (NYSE:MWW), is a global leader in successfully connecting job opportunities and people. Monster uses the world's most advanced technology to help people Find Better, matching job seekers to opportunities via digital, social and mobile solutions including monster.com®, our flagship website, and employers to the best talent u...

KPA: KPA delivers Environmental Health & Safety, HR Management and F&I Compliance programs that help our clients achieve regulatory compliance, control risk, protect their assets and effectively manage people through a combination of innovative software, award winning training and on-site consulting.

Who is more expensive? TalentBin or KPA Human Resource Manager?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Talent Management software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for TalentBin and KPA Human Resource Manager.

TalentBin price starts at $5,000 per year , On a scale between 1 to 10 TalentBin is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Talent Management software. KPA Human Resource Manager accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 TalentBin is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Talent Management software.

Bottom line: KPA Human Resource Manager is more expensive than TalentBin.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared TalentBin Vs. KPA HR based on some of the most important and required Talent Management features.

TalentBin: Recruiting Management, Resume Database, Applicant Tracking, Talent Management, Workflow Rules & Management, Product Lifecycle Management.

KPA Human Resource Manager: We are still working to collect the list of features for KPA Human Resource Manager.

Target customer size

Customers of the software include businesses of all sizes and a variety of types. and KPA Human Resource Manager's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.