Shlomi Lavi /
Feb 06, 2023
We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - test IO or Airbrake?
test IO is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Airbrake, and test IO is rated higher (84/100) than Airbrake (79/100).
Looking for the right Bug Tracking solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
test IO Vs. Airbrake
test IO: test IO was founded in 2011.
We’re located in San Francisco and Berlin.We help businesses to ship better apps with fewer bugs.
Airbrake: Airbrake is the leading exception reporting service, currently providing error tracking for 50,000 applications with support for 18 programming languages.
We let developers build better software by giving detailed reports of errors in applications. Giving you insight into the health of your application in production. We give detailed exception r...
Who is more expensive? test IO or Airbrake?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Bug Tracking software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for test IO and Airbrake.
test IO price starts at $2,000 per feature/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 test IO is rated 10, which is much higher than the average cost of Bug Tracking software. Airbrake price starts at $19 per month , When comparing Airbrake to its competitors, the software is rated 8 - higher than the average Bug Tracking software cost.
Bottom line: test IO is more expensive than Airbrake.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared test IO Vs. Airbrake based on some of the most important and required Bug Tracking features.
test IO: We are still working to collect the list of features for test IO.
Airbrake: We are still working to collect the list of features for Airbrake.
Target customer size
The typical customers who benefit from using test IO are those belonging to small to medium-sized business as well as large enterprises mainly in the field of software repair. The typical customers who benefit from using Airbrake are those belonging to small to medium-sized business as well as large enterprises that are mainly in the field of software and mobile application repair.