This app is all about crowd testing. Professionals are called upon because of their innate skills and great judgment calls. Because of the streamlined features, users have a very easy time applying and using te...
Compare PricingWe publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. Learn more by reading our advertiser disclosure.
test IO is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Bugzilla, test IO is rated higher (84/100) than Bugzilla (81/100). Bugzilla offers more features (2) to their users than test IO (0).
Looking for the right Bug Tracking solution for your business? buyers like you are primarily concerned about the real total implementation cost (TCO), full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, pros and cons. In this article we compare between the 2 software products:
test IO: test IO was founded in 2011. We’re located in San Francisco and Berlin.We help businesses to ship better apps with fewer bugs.
Bugzilla: Bugzilla is server software designed to help you manage software development.
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Bug Tracking software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance & support and other related services. When calculating the TCO it's important to add all of these "hidden cost" as well. We prepared a TCO calculator for test IO and Bugzilla.
test IO accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , on a scale between 1 to 10 test IO is rated 10, which is much higher than the average cost of Bug Tracking software. Bugzilla accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , on a scale between 1 to 10 test IO is rated 10, which is much higher than the average cost of Bug Tracking software.
Bottom line: test IO is more expensive than Bugzilla.
As with any business software solutions, it’s important to consider the features & functionality. The tool should support the processes, workflows, reports and needs that matter to your team. To help you evaluate this, we've compared test IO Vs. Bugzilla based on some of the most important and required Bug Tracking features. test IO: We are still working to collect the list of features for test IO. Bugzilla: Workflow, Configurable Workflow.
The typical customers who benefit from using test IO are those belonging to small to medium-sized business as well as large enterprises mainly in the field of software repair. and Bugzilla's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.
This app is all about crowd testing. Professionals are called upon because of their innate skills and great judgment calls. Because of the streamlined features, users have a very easy time applying and using te...
Compare PricingITQlick Score: | 84/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: | (4.8/5) |
Pricing: | 10/10 - high cost |
Category: | Bug Tracking -> test IO |
Company: | test IO |
Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
Platforms: | Desktop, Cloud |
Links: | test IO review, test IO pricing, test IO alternatives |
ITQlick Score: | 81/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: | (4.2/5) |
Pricing: | 2/10 - low cost |
Category: | Bug Tracking -> Bugzilla |
Company: | Bugzilla |
Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
Platforms: | Desktop, Mobile, Cloud |
Links: | Bugzilla review, Bugzilla pricing, Bugzilla alternatives |
Shlomi holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information System Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 15 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant, and implementation expert for small, medium and large size (global) companies.