Shlomi Lavi / Jun 06, 2023We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
test IO is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Smartlook, and test IO is rated higher (84/100) than Smartlook (76/100).
Looking for the right Bug Tracking solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
test IO: test IO was founded in 2011. We’re located in San Francisco and Berlin.We help businesses to ship better apps with fewer bugs.
Smartlook: A simple recording tool that anyone can use. Slowly we started to learn that Smartlook would never be ideal for solopreneurs and small businesses. They simply cannot afford to have a dedicated analytics person.
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Bug Tracking software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for test IO and Smartlook.
test IO price starts at $2,000 per feature/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 test IO is rated 10, which is much higher than the average cost of Bug Tracking software. Smartlook price starts at $55 per month , When comparing Smartlook to its competitors, the software is rated 4 - lower than the average Bug Tracking software cost.
Bottom line: test IO is more expensive than Smartlook.
We've compared test IO Vs. Smartlook based on some of the most important and required Bug Tracking features.
test IO: We are still working to collect the list of features for test IO.
Smartlook: We are still working to collect the list of features for Smartlook.
The typical customers who benefit from using test IO are those belonging to small to medium-sized business as well as large enterprises mainly in the field of software repair. and Smartlook's target customer size include: SMBs.
starts at $2,000 per feature/month
This app is all about crowd testing. Professionals are called upon because of their innate skills and great judgment calls. Because of the streamlined features, users have a very easy time applying and using te...
Compare Pricingstarts at $55 per month
SmartLook is a business intelligence toolset designed to help enterprises assess lead behavior. With a variety of tools, the software provides replays of users websites and apps, giving statistics on what conte...
Compare Pricing| ITQlick Score: | 84/100 |
|---|---|
| ITQlick Rating: |
|
| Pricing: | 10/10 - high cost |
| Category: | Bug Tracking -> test IO review |
| Company: | test IO |
| Pricing: | starts at $2,000 per feature/month |
| Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
| Platforms: | Desktop, Cloud |
| Links: | test IO review, test IO pricing, test IO alternatives |
| ITQlick Score: | 76/100 |
|---|---|
| ITQlick Rating: |
|
| Pricing: | 4/10 - average cost |
| Category: | Bug Tracking -> Smartlook review |
| Company: | Smartlook |
| Pricing: | starts at $55 per month |
| Typical customers: | SMBs |
| Platforms: | Cloud |
| Links: | Smartlook review, Smartlook pricing, Smartlook alternatives |
Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.