Shlomi Lavi /
May 23, 2022
We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - test IO or SpiraTeam?
test IO is more expensive to implement (TCO) than SpiraTeam, and test IO is rated higher (84/100) than SpiraTeam (79/100). SpiraTeam offers users more features (6) than test IO (0).
Looking for the right Bug Tracking solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
test IO Vs. INFLECTRA CORPORATION
test IO: test IO was founded in 2011.
We’re located in San Francisco and Berlin.We help businesses to ship better apps with fewer bugs.
INFLECTRA CORPORATION: Inflectra is a privately held software company dedicated to helping our customers - large corporations, small businesses, professional services firms, government agencies and individual developers – with the means to effectively and affordably manage their software development lifecycles, so as to decrease the time to market and increase return on ...
Who is more expensive? test IO or SpiraTeam?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Bug Tracking software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for test IO and SpiraTeam.
test IO price starts at $2,000 per feature/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 test IO is rated 10, which is much higher than the average cost of Bug Tracking software. SpiraTeam price starts at $43.50 per user/month , When comparing SpiraTeam to its competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Bug Tracking software cost.
Bottom line: test IO is more expensive than SpiraTeam.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared test IO Vs. SpiraTeam based on some of the most important and required Bug Tracking features.
test IO: We are still working to collect the list of features for test IO.
SpiraTeam: Basic Reports, Data Import/Export, Online Customer Support, Version Control, Project Management.
Target customer size
The typical customers who benefit from using test IO are those belonging to small to medium-sized business as well as large enterprises mainly in the field of software repair. The typical clients of SpiraTeam software are the entrepreneurs from SMBs (small and medium-sized businesses having one to 100 employees and/or greater than 100 to 1,000 employees, respectively) as well as large enterprises harnessing the services from the industry of IT, data hosting, and information related services, mainly with quality management and application lifecycle management.