Shlomi Lavi /
Apr 22, 2022
We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - Textura or CoreconLink?
Textura is more expensive to implement (TCO) than CoreconLink, and CoreconLink is rated with the same score (90/100) as Textura (90/100). CoreconLink offers users more features (6) than Textura (3). There is a clear winner in this case and it is CoreconLink!
Looking for the right Team Collaboration solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
Textura Corporation Vs. Corecon Technologies Inc.
Textura Corporation: ...
Corecon Technologies Inc.: Corecon was created with one thing in mind – increasing the efficiency of your business. Corecon's construction software suite streamlines workflow and enhances productivity from the office to the jobsite.
Who is more expensive? Textura or CoreconLink?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Team Collaboration software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Textura and CoreconLink.
Textura price starts at $250 per license , On a scale between 1 to 10 Textura is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Team Collaboration software. CoreconLink price starts at $25 per user/month , When comparing CoreconLink to its competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Team Collaboration software cost.
Bottom line: Textura is more expensive than CoreconLink.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared Textura Vs. CoreconLink based on some of the most important and required Team Collaboration features.
Textura: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support.
CoreconLink: Basic Reports, Data Import/Export, Online Customer Support, Data Analysis Tools, Project Management.
Target customer size
Textura CPM Enterprise is suitable for large general contractor, developers and owners that are looking
for a construction payment management solution. and CoreconLink's target customer size include: SMBs.