Compare The Asset Guardian and FieldAware - Aug 2022

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - The Asset Guardian or FieldAware?

The Asset Guardian is more expensive to implement (TCO) than FieldAware, and FieldAware is rated higher (91/100) than The Asset Guardian (82/100). The Asset Guardian offers users more features (5) than FieldAware (0).

Looking for the right Maintenance solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

VeroSoft Design Vs. FieldAware

VeroSoft Design: Take advantage of a complete set of reports and historical data for better decision-making and to improve overall perforamance. Intuitive maintenance Dashboard with Power BI and predefined system-generated reports.

FieldAware: We are re-shaping the field service industry! Our made-for-mobile, cloud-based software was designed from the ground up to provide ease of use with incredible flexibility – a combination that enables field service organizations to amaze their customers, astonish the staff and surprise the competition. Our software was architected as a mobile platfo...

Who is more expensive? The Asset Guardian or FieldAware?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Maintenance software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for The Asset Guardian and FieldAware.

The Asset Guardian accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 The Asset Guardian (TAG) is rated 8, which is higher than the average cost of Maintenance software. FieldAware price starts at $70 per user/month , When comparing FieldAware to its competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Maintenance software cost.

Bottom line: The Asset Guardian is more expensive than FieldAware.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared The Asset Guardian Vs. FieldAware based on some of the most important and required Maintenance features.

The Asset Guardian: Forecasting & Budgeting, Barcoding, Inventory Management, Inventory Optimization, Warehouse Management.

FieldAware: We are still working to collect the list of features for FieldAware.

Target customer size

The Asset Guardian's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, Field aware is suitable for companies that provide services that might require on field maintenance.