Thinking Cap LMS Vs LAMS

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / Oct 12, 2021

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. Learn more by reading our advertiser disclosure.

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Thinking Cap LMS or LAMS?

LAMS is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Thinking Cap LMS, LAMS is rated higher (92/100) than Thinking Cap LMS (91/100). Thinking Cap LMS offers more features (13) to their users than LAMS (0).

Looking for the right LMS solution for your business? buyers like you are primarily concerned about the real total implementation cost (TCO), full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, pros and cons. In this article we compare between the 2 software products:

How Thinking Cap compares with LAMS Foundation?

Thinking Cap: Thinking Cap was founded in the spring of 2001. In 2003, Thinking Cap launched the first versions of Thinking Cap® Author and Thinking Cap LMS. Without a customer, we made the investment to create the first XML-based eLearning system. This was done for one reason - it was needed. With over 70 commercial and open source Authoring Tools and LMS produ...

LAMS Foundation: The LAMS Foundation is a not-for-profit organisation that manages research and development into LAMS and the concepts of Learning Design. The Foundation is based at Macquarie University, Australia as part of the Macquarie E-learning Centre Of Excellence (MELCOE), under the leadership of Professor James Dalziel (Director of MELCOE and inventor of L...

Who's more expensive? Thinking Cap LMS or LAMS?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of LMS software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance & support and other related services. When calculating the TCO it's important to add all of these "hidden cost" as well. We prepared a TCO calculator for Thinking Cap LMS and LAMS.

Thinking Cap LMS price starts at $12,000 per year , on a scale between 1 to 10 Thinking Cap LMS is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of LMS software. LAMS accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , on a scale between 1 to 10 Thinking Cap LMS is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of LMS software.

Bottom line:LAMS is more expensive than Thinking Cap LMS.

Which software includes more/better features?

As with any business software solutions, it’s important to consider the features & functionality. The tool should support the processes, workflows, reports and needs that matter to your team. To help you evaluate this, we've compared Thinking Cap LMS Vs. LAMS based on some of the most important and required LMS features. Thinking Cap LMS: this software is considered "feature-rich" with more than 10 important features, here is a partial list: Blended Learning, Career Tracking, Collaboration Management, Course Catalog, Course Interactivity, Custom Functionality, eLearning, Individual-Based Plans. LAMS: We are still working to collect the list of features for LAMS.

Target customer size

Thinking Cap LMS's typical customers include: Start up, Small business, Medium business, Large business, Private use, and LAMS's target customer size include: SMBs.

Thinking Cap LMS

ITQlick rating
(4.2/5)

starts at $12,000 per year

Thinking Caps is a cloud-based learning management solution designed for medium and large corporate, nonprofit and government institutions. The core features include learning management, reporting, and branding...

Categories: LMS.

LAMS

ITQlick rating
(3.5/5)

LAMS software is a web-based learning design application built to help design, manage and deliver online learning through collaborative learning activities. The software offers the tutors a highly spontaneous v...

Categories: LMS.

Compare specifications

LAMS Specifications

ITQlick Score: 92/100
ITQlick Rating: (3.5/5)
Pricing: 6/10 - average cost
Category: LMS -> LAMS
Company: LAMS Foundation
Typical customers: SMBs
Platforms: Desktop, Cloud
Links: LAMS review, LAMS pricing, LAMS alternatives

Compare features

Thinking Cap LMS: 13 Features

Blended Learning
Career Tracking
Collaboration Management
Course Catalog
Course Interactivity
Custom Functionality
eLearning
Individual-Based Plans
Legacy System Integration
Performance Assessment
Skills Assessment
Training Metrics
User Access Controls

LAMS: 0 Features

We are working to collect the information
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
Thinking
ITQlick rating
4.2/5
Score
91/100
Pricing
5.6/10
License pricing
$12,000 per year
Functionality
14
Compare
LAMS
ITQlick rating
3.5/5
Score
92/100
Pricing
6.4/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
3
Review
Coassemble
ITQlick rating
4.6/5
Score
94/100
Pricing
3/10
License pricing
$9 per month
Functionality
4
Coggno
ITQlick rating
4.6/5
Score
92/100
Pricing
6.6/10
License pricing
$16.74 per license
Functionality
16
Review
Finalsite
ITQlick rating
4.8/5
Score
92/100
Pricing
6/10
License pricing
$3,000 per license
Functionality
3
Author

Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin Facebook Twitter

Shlomi holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information System Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 15 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant, and implementation expert for small, medium and large size (global) companies.