Compare Time Machine and Arctor File Repository - Feb 2023

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / Feb 27, 2023

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - Time Machine or Arctor File Repository?

Arctor File Repository is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Time Machine, and Time Machine is rated higher (92/100) than Arctor File Repository (62/100). Both tools offer the same amount of features.

Looking for the right Automated Testing solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

Apple Vs. byteplant

Apple: Apple Inc., formerly Apple Computer, Inc., is an American multinational corporation headquartered in Cupertino, California[2] that designs, develops, and sells consumer electronics, computer software and personal computers. Its best-known hardware products are the Mac line of computers, the iPod music player, the iPhone smartphone, and the iPad tab...

byteplant: Since 2003, Byteplant has quickly gained international success and a worldwide reputation as a provider of highly effective, cost efficient and easy to use email security and email management solutions. Our software products and services are used by customers of all sizes from small businesses to large publicly listed companies and government agenc...

Who is more expensive? Time Machine or Arctor File Repository?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Automated Testing software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Time Machine and Arctor File Repository.

Time Machine accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Time Machine is rated 4, which is lower than the average cost of Automated Testing software. Arctor File Repository price starts at $103.35 per license , When comparing Arctor File Repository to its competitors, the software is rated 4 - lower than the average Automated Testing software cost.

Bottom line: Time Machine cost is around the same cost of Arctor File Repository.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared Time Machine Vs. Arctor File Repository based on some of the most important and required Automated Testing features.

Time Machine: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support.

Arctor File Repository: Data Import/Export, Basic Reports, Online Customer Support.

Target customer size

Time Machine Automated Testing Software caters to a wide range of industries that require automation testing to ensure software functionality and efficiency. and Arctor File Repository's target customer size include: Start up, Small business, Medium business, Large business.



Time Machine

ITQlick rating
(3.5/5)

Time Machine is a growing cloud-based Backup software, it is designed to support medium and large size business. Time Machine received a rating of 3.5 from ITQlick team. The software cost is considered affordab...

Categories: Time Tracking, Backup.

Arctor File Repository

ITQlick rating
(4.4/5)

starts at $103.35 per license

Arctor File Repository is a growing cloud-based Backup software, it is designed to support small, medium and large size business. Arctor File Repository received a rating of 4.4 from ITQlick team. The software ...

Categories: Business backup.

Compare specifications

Compare features

Time Machine: 3 Features

Data Import/Export
Basic Reports
Online Customer Support

Arctor File Repository: 3 Features

Data Import/Export
Basic Reports
Online Customer Support
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
Time Mac...
ITQlick rating
3.5/5
Score
92/100
Pricing
4.8/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
5
Compare
Arctor F...
ITQlick rating
4.4/5
Score
62/100
Pricing
5.8/10
License pricing
$103.35 per license
Functionality
4
Applitools
ITQlick rating
2.8/5
Score
85/100
Pricing
10/10
License pricing
$299 per user/month
Functionality
4
SpiraTest
ITQlick rating
3.1/5
Score
62/100
Pricing
4.6/10
License pricing
$33 per concurrent user/month
Functionality
6
Testlodge
ITQlick rating
4.7/5
Score
62/100
Pricing
3.8/10
License pricing
$29 per month
Functionality
5

Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.