Compare time@work and eSUB - Jun 2022

Shlomi Lavi

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - time@work or eSUB?

time@work is more expensive to implement (TCO) than eSUB, and eSUB is rated higher (97/100) than time@work (83/100). eSUB offers users more features (17) than time@work (5). There is a clear winner in this case and it is eSUB!

Looking for the right Attendance Tracking solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

systems@work Vs. eSUB

systems@work: systems@work is a leading provider of Expense Management, Time Recording and Professional Services Automation solutions. systems@work staff are amongst the most experienced and highly skilled consultants in their field and we engage with organisations around the world to ensure that projects are implemented on time and within budget. systems@...

eSUB: About 30 years ago eSUB originated as an off shoot of a consulting firm who represented Specialty Contractors to create construction claims for retroactive payment for work they had already performed. Managing project documents back then was inefficient, subject to mistakes and omissions. The familiar way was to manually update multiple programs...

Who is more expensive? time@work or eSUB?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Attendance Tracking software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for time@work and eSUB.

time@work price starts at $20,000 per license , On a scale between 1 to 10 time@work is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Attendance Tracking software. eSUB accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 time@work is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Attendance Tracking software.

Bottom line: time@work is more expensive than eSUB.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared time@work Vs. eSUB based on some of the most important and required Attendance Tracking features.

time@work: Dashboard, Employee Onboarding, Project Billing, Billing & Invoicing, Time Tracking.

eSUB: Mobile Access, Telephone Customer Support, Web Hosted Solution, Document Management, Resource Management.

Target customer size

Customers of the software include businesses of all sizes and a wide range of types. eSUB is specifically designed for subcontractors running a small and mid-size business.