Shlomi Lavi /
Dec 11, 2022
We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - time@work or PurelyHR?
time@work is more expensive to implement (TCO) than PurelyHR, and PurelyHR is rated higher (91/100) than time@work (83/100). PurelyHR offers users more features (6) than time@work (5). There is a clear winner in this case and it is PurelyHR!
Looking for the right Attendance Tracking solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
systems@work Vs. Ironflow Technologies Inc
systems@work: systems@work is a leading provider of Expense Management, Time Recording and Professional Services Automation solutions.
systems@work staff are amongst the most experienced and highly skilled consultants in their field and we engage with organisations around the world to ensure that projects are implemented on time and within budget.
systems@...
Ironflow Technologies Inc: Composed of a focused team of developers, we are on the leading edge of new technologies and modern design styles. We provide services in web application development and database administrations. We help our clients to strengthen and grow their businesses by building engaging, innovative and cost-effective solutions.
We are constantly training and...
Who is more expensive? time@work or PurelyHR?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Attendance Tracking software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for time@work and PurelyHR.
time@work price starts at $20,000 per license , On a scale between 1 to 10 time@work is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Attendance Tracking software. PurelyHR price starts at $4.50 per employee/month , When comparing PurelyHR to its competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Attendance Tracking software cost.
Bottom line: time@work is more expensive than PurelyHR.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared time@work Vs. PurelyHR based on some of the most important and required Attendance Tracking features.
time@work: Dashboard, Employee Onboarding, Project Billing, Billing & Invoicing, Time Tracking.
PurelyHR: Employee Scheduling, Absence Management, Employee Time Clock, FMLA Tracking, Overtime Tracking.
Target customer size
Customers of the software include businesses of all sizes and a wide range of types. and PurelyHR's target customer size include: Small businesses and start ups.