Compare Timereaction and Basecamp - Feb 2023
Compare Pricing
Shlomi Lavi / Feb 28, 2023We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - Timereaction or Basecamp?
Basecamp is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Timereaction, and Basecamp is rated higher (98/100) than Timereaction (75/100). Timereaction offers users more features (6) than Basecamp (5).
Looking for the right Project Management solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
Timereaction Vs. Basecamp
Timereaction: Workflow, conversations and files in one place, so you find the information you need, getting more done, with less effort.
Basecamp: Basecamp is a company spread out across 26 different cities around the world. Started the business back in 1999 (used to be called 37signals, but recently changed the name of the business to Basecamp, to match the name of their most popular product).
Who is more expensive? Timereaction or Basecamp?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Project Management software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Timereaction and Basecamp.
Timereaction price starts at $100 per month , On a scale between 1 to 10 Timereaction is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Project Management software. Basecamp price starts at $11 per user/month , When comparing Basecamp to its competitors, the software is rated 4 - lower than the average Project Management software cost.
Bottom line: Basecamp is more expensive than Timereaction.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared Timereaction Vs. Basecamp based on some of the most important and required Project Management features.
Timereaction: Project Management, Task Management, Order Processing Management, Supply Chain, Product Lifecycle Management, Business Process.
Basecamp: Document Management, Project Management, Resource Management, Scheduling, Task Management.
Target customer size
Timereaction's typical customers include: SMBs,
Basecamp Project Management software serves a wide range of customers from various industries.
Compare specifications
Timereaction Specifications
| ITQlick Score: | 75/100 |
|---|---|
| ITQlick Rating: |
|
| Pricing: | 2/10 - low cost |
| Category: | Project Management -> Timereaction review |
| Company: | Timereaction |
| Pricing: | starts at $100 per month |
| Typical customers: | SMBs |
| Platforms: | Desktop, Mobile, Cloud |
| Links: | Timereaction review, Timereaction pricing, Timereaction alternatives |
Basecamp Specifications
| ITQlick Score: | 98/100 |
|---|---|
| ITQlick Rating: |
|
| Pricing: | 4/10 - average cost |
| Category: | Project Management -> Basecamp review |
| Company: | Basecamp |
| Pricing: | starts at $11 per user/month |
| Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
| Platforms: | Desktop, Mobile, Cloud |
| Links: | Basecamp review, Basecamp pricing, Basecamp alternatives |
Compare features
Timereaction: 6 Features
Basecamp: 5 Features
Auditor - Shlomi Lavi
Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.