Shlomi Lavi /
Jul 23, 2022
We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - TrackerRMS - PSA or Q-Flow Appointment?
Q-Flow Appointment is more expensive to implement (TCO) than TrackerRMS - PSA, and Q-Flow Appointment is rated higher (87/100) than TrackerRMS - PSA (82/100).
Looking for the right Professional Services Automation solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
TrackerRMS Vs. Q-Nomy
TrackerRMS: TrackerRMS was formed from the recognition that there were growing demands within the sales and recruitment sector for the integration of a variety of stand-alone systems providing various levels of specific functionality. Combined with a need to reduce the costs of IT infrastructure and improve the ability to track and analyse customer data, Track...
Q-Nomy: Since 2002, Q-nomy has been developing, selling, and implementing software solutions that help organizations optimize the customer experience in their branches or stores.
Q-nomy’s vision is to make the most of every customer visit: more sales, greater customer satisfaction, and a better overall experience.
Q-nomy’s software tailors the indi...
Who is more expensive? TrackerRMS - PSA or Q-Flow Appointment Management?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Professional Services Automation software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for TrackerRMS - PSA and Q-Flow Appointment Management.
TrackerRMS - PSA price starts at $80 per user/year , On a scale between 1 to 10 TrackerRMS - PSA is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Professional Services Automation software. Q-Flow Appointment Management accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 TrackerRMS - PSA is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Professional Services Automation software.
Bottom line: Q-Flow Appointment Management is more expensive than TrackerRMS - PSA.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared TrackerRMS - PSA Vs. Q-Flow Appointment based on some of the most important and required Professional Services Automation features.
TrackerRMS - PSA: We are still working to collect the list of features for TrackerRMS - PSA.
Q-Flow Appointment Management: We are still working to collect the list of features for Q-Flow Appointment Management.
Target customer size
Tracker RMS can assist companies working in any sector. and Q-Flow Appointment Management's target customer size include: Small, medium and large size businesses.