Shlomi Lavi /
May 16, 2022
We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - Transpose or CHAMPS EAM?
CHAMPS EAM is more expensive to implement (TCO) than Transpose, and Transpose is rated higher (85/100) than CHAMPS EAM (79/100). Transpose offers users more features (5) than CHAMPS EAM (3). There is a clear winner in this case and it is Transpose!
Looking for the right Asset Tracking solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
Transpose Technologies Vs. champs software inc
Transpose Technologies: Transpose Software is a company with decades of experience in analysis, design, development and support, and has created a huge range of applications, websites and mobile apps.
We've worked on a wide range of bespoke, business critical, systems for global corporations.
Our current clients include General Motors, Marshall Amplification and a num...
champs software inc: CHAMPS is focused on creating and implementing software solutions that enable large enterprises to optimize the life cycles of their capital assets. Essential items to be optimized include an Enterprise’s work force, equipment, facilities, vehicles, tools, spare parts and linear assets. The efficient acquisition, maintenance, repairs, replacement a...
Who is more expensive? Transpose or CHAMPS EAM - Facilities Management?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Asset Tracking software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Transpose and CHAMPS EAM - Facilities Management.
Transpose price starts at $14.99 per user/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 Transpose is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Asset Tracking software. CHAMPS EAM - Facilities Management accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 Transpose is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Asset Tracking software.
Bottom line: CHAMPS EAM - Facilities Management is more expensive than Transpose.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared Transpose Vs. CHAMPS EAM based on some of the most important and required Asset Tracking features.
Transpose: Barcoding, Fixed Asset Management, Multi-Location, RFID Integration, Inventory Management.
CHAMPS EAM - Facilities Management: Maintenance Overview, Recurring Work Orders, Streamlined Work Orders.
Target customer size
Transpose's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, CHAMPS EAM has mainly been designed for medium sized and enterprise level organizations.