Compare TurboCASH and SAP Financials On Demand - Mar 2022

Shlomi LaviShlomi Lavi / Mar 14, 2022

We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .

Bottom Line: Which is Better - TurboCASH or SAP Financials On Demand?

SAP Financials On Demand is more expensive to implement (TCO) than TurboCASH, and TurboCASH is rated higher (91/100) than SAP Financials On Demand (89/100). SAP Financials On Demand offers users more features (3) than TurboCASH (2).

Looking for the right Core Accounting solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:

TurboCASH Vs. SAP

TurboCASH: TurboCASH Accounting is a community developed, top drawer, SME accounting package that will make your business competitive. Here is a world class software package that is going to improve your profitability. Best of all it is free. There are no catches here. We are not looking to become your "accounting department". It is our pleasure to watch you ...

SAP: SAP ® AG is German software corporation that makes enterprise software to manage business operations and customer relations. SAP ® is the market leader in enterprise application software. The company's best-known software products are its enterprise resource planning application (SAP ® ERP), its enterpr...

Who is more expensive? TurboCASH or SAP Financials On Demand?

The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Core Accounting software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for TurboCASH and SAP Financials On Demand.

TurboCASH price starts at $60 per year , On a scale between 1 to 10 TurboCASH Open Source Accounting is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Core Accounting software. SAP Financials On Demand accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 TurboCASH Open Source Accounting is rated 2, which is much lower than the average cost of Core Accounting software.

Bottom line: SAP Financials On Demand is more expensive than TurboCASH.

Which software includes more/better features?

We've compared TurboCASH Vs. SAP Financials On Demand based on some of the most important and required Core Accounting features.

TurboCASH: Accounts Payable, Accounts Receivable.

SAP Financials On Demand: Cash Flow, Cash flow/cash budget, Real Time Comparisons.

Target customer size

TurboCASH's typical customers include: Start up, Small business, Medium business, Large business, Financials OnDemand has been designed to target medium and large businesses and is primarily focused on the Finance departments in these organizations.

TurboCASH

ITQlick rating
(3.8/5)

starts at $60 per year

TurboCASH Open Source Accounting is an on-premise and cloud-based open source accounting software for small businesses, that is aimed at helping with invoicing, budgeting, and inventory management. This softwar...

Categories: Accounting & Finance, Remote Access.

SAP Financials On Demand

ITQlick rating
(4.5/5)

SAP launched Financials OnDemand in late 2012 as a stand-alone financial management solution designed exclusively for the cloud. It tracks end-to-end financial transactions from order to cash and procurement to...

Categories: Billing & Invoicing, Budgeting & CPM, Core Accounting, Financial reporting, Fixed Asset Accounting.

Compare specifications

Compare features

TurboCASH: 2 Features

Accounts Payable
Accounts Receivable

SAP Financials On Demand: 3 Features

Cash Flow
Cash flow/cash budget
Real Time Comparisons
ITQlick rating ITQlick Rating is based on the software score (below) and aggregated online reviews
ITQlick score ITQlick Score is a 1 to 100, the calculation is based on pricing, and functionality Vs. alternative solutions
Pricing score pricing Score is a 1 to 10 (10 is high cost), based on the TCO (cost of licences, customizations, training, hardware when relevant) Vs. alternative solutions
License pricing license pricing (if provided by the software vendor)
Functionality score
Software review
Compare
TurboCAS...
ITQlick rating
3.8/5
Score
91/100
Pricing
3/10
License pricing
$60 per year
Functionality
4
Compare
SAP Fina...
ITQlick rating
4.5/5
Score
89/100
Pricing
4.8/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
15
QuickBoo...
ITQlick rating
4.2/5
Score
99/100
Pricing
5/10
License pricing
$12.50 per month
Functionality
7
Wave Acc...
ITQlick rating
4.4/5
Score
97/100
Pricing
5.6/10
License pricing
Pricing not available
Functionality
8
Zoho Boo...
ITQlick rating
4.4/5
Score
96/100
Pricing
2.4/10
License pricing
$10 per organizer/month
Functionality
9

Auditor - Shlomi Lavi

Website Linkedin profile Facebook Twitter

Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.