Shlomi Lavi / Mar 21, 2022We publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Typeform is more expensive to implement (TCO) than PlanSwift, and PlanSwift is rated higher (96/100) than Typeform (90/100). Typeform offers users more features (9) than PlanSwift (4).
Looking for the right Survey Software solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
Typeform: The versatile data collection tool for professionals. Typeform makes asking easy & answering refreshing.
PlanSwift: PlanSwift, a Textura Company, is the nation’s fastest growing developer and distributor of digital estimating and takeoff software for the construction industry. PlanSwift software is specifically designed for, but not limited to the construction industry. We have been positively impacting the construction software industry for the last 6 years, pr...
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Survey Software software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for Typeform and PlanSwift construction.
Typeform price starts at $21 per user/month , On a scale between 1 to 10 Typeform is rated 6, which is similar to the average cost of Survey Software software. PlanSwift construction price starts at $1,595 per license , When comparing PlanSwift construction to its competitors, the software is rated 2 - much lower than the average Survey Software software cost.
Bottom line: Typeform is more expensive than PlanSwift construction.
We've compared Typeform Vs. PlanSwift based on some of the most important and required Survey Software features.
Typeform: Data analysis, Project Collaboration, Email Marketing, Marketing, Online Marketing, Create Plain-Text Messages, Data Center Management, Survey Software.
PlanSwift construction: Data Analysis Tools, Project Management, Estimating, Construction.
Typeform's typical customers include: Small, medium and large size businesses, PlanSwift Construction software is custom made for the construction industry, but it is not limited to that field.
starts at $21 per user/month
Typeform is a growing cloud-based Survey Software software, it is designed to support small, medium and large size business. Typeform received a rating of 4.7 from ITQlick team. The software cost is considered ...
Compare Pricing| ITQlick Score: | 90/100 |
|---|---|
| ITQlick Rating: |
|
| Pricing: | 6/10 - average cost |
| Category: | Survey Software -> Typeform review |
| Company: | Typeform |
| Pricing: | starts at $21 per user/month |
| Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
| Platforms: | Cloud |
| Links: | Typeform review, Typeform pricing, Typeform alternatives |
| ITQlick Score: | 96/100 |
|---|---|
| ITQlick Rating: |
|
| Pricing: | 2/10 - low cost |
| Category: | Survey Software -> PlanSwift review |
| Company: | PlanSwift |
| Pricing: | starts at $1,595 per license |
| Typical customers: | Small, medium and large size businesses |
| Platforms: | Desktop, Mobile, Cloud |
| Links: | PlanSwift review, PlanSwift pricing, PlanSwift alternatives |
Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.