Compare UMANA and APS - Dec 2022
Compare PricingWe publish unbiased reviews. Our opinions are our own and are not influenced by payments from advertisers. This content is reader-supported, which means if you leave your details with us we may earn a commission. Learn why ITQlick is free .
Bottom Line: Which is Better - UMANA or APS?
UMANA is more expensive to implement (TCO) than APS, and APS is rated higher (98/100) than UMANA (82/100). UMANA offers users more features (9) than APS (7).
Looking for the right Payroll solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. In this article we compare between the two software products:
Carver Technologies Vs. APS
Carver Technologies: UMANA designs, adapts and implements top of the line, time, human resources and payroll management software for medium-sized businesses. Carver technologies has its head office located in downtown Montreal, and a client base of organizations working in a wide variety of fields such as research , government, municipalities, museums and manufacturing...
APS: APS is a national workforce management and payroll tax compliance provider committed to delivering value through flexible cloud technology and individualized support. Our cloud-based solution provides payroll, core HR, time & attendance, self-service, and mobile in a single platform which can adapt to meet changing customer needs.
Who is more expensive? UMANA or APS?
The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Payroll software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. When calculating the TCO, it's important to add all of these ”hidden costs” as well. We prepared a TCO (Total Cost) calculator for UMANA and APS.
UMANA accurate pricing info is available upon request (they don't share it publicly), however , On a scale between 1 to 10 UMANA is rated 8, which is higher than the average cost of Payroll software. APS price starts at $50 per month , When comparing APS to its competitors, the software is rated 6 - similar to the average Payroll software cost.
Bottom line: UMANA is more expensive than APS.
Which software includes more/better features?
We've compared UMANA Vs. APS based on some of the most important and required Payroll features.
UMANA: Benefits Administration, Employee Self-Service, Payroll, Timesheet, Human Resources, Data Analysis Tools, Applicant Tracking, Business performance management.
APS: Benefits Administration, Employee Self-Service, Payroll, Direct Deposit, Payroll Tax Management.
Target customer size
UMANA's typical customers include: Medium and large size businesses, and APS's target customer size include: SMBs.
Compare specifications
UMANA Specifications
ITQlick Score: | 82/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 8/10 - high cost |
Category: | Payroll -> UMANA review |
Company: | Carver Technologies |
Typical customers: | Medium and large size businesses |
Platforms: | Desktop, Mobile, Cloud |
Links: | UMANA review, UMANA pricing, UMANA alternatives |
APS Specifications
ITQlick Score: | 98/100 |
---|---|
ITQlick Rating: |
|
Pricing: | 6/10 - average cost |
Category: | Human Resources -> APS review |
Company: | APS |
Pricing: | starts at $50 per month |
Typical customers: | SMBs |
Platforms: | Mobile, Cloud |
Links: | APS review, APS pricing, APS alternatives |
Compare features
UMANA: 9 Features
APS: 7 Features
Auditor - Shlomi Lavi
Shlomi Lavi is an entrepreneur and founder of ITQlick.com. He holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) in Information Systems Engineering from Ben Gurion University in Israel. Shlomi brings 17 years of global IT and IS management experience as a consultant and implementation expert for small, medium and large-sized (global) companies. Shlomi’s goal is to share the best knowledge and news about information systems so you can make smarter buying decisions for your business.